I would guess it's a replacement for when you would implement (non-display) child nodes to store content.
I recently built a site that had child nodes for repeating header content. The repeating content had an image, header and RTE. I implemented this with child nodes, but would have used this package if it was available.
Usage
What is the benefit of using Repeatable Custom Content over standard datatype with properties?
Thank you for info
I would guess it's a replacement for when you would implement (non-display) child nodes to store content.
I recently built a site that had child nodes for repeating header content. The repeating content had an image, header and RTE. I implemented this with child nodes, but would have used this package if it was available.
Great work Masood, thanks.
Chris
Thanks Chris,
Petr, I guess Chris has answered your question. But i would be adding more details soon on http://blog.masoodafzal.com ;
thanks
There's been more than once that I've missed a datatype like this - I love it! Great job Masood!
Nicely done Masood, I've alse created non-display child nodes to create "list items" on the parent page - this package is perfect for thse situations
Thanks all,
Any suggestions are welcome
cheers
Masood
Thank you for additional info and promising datatype.
one suggestion:
support another xml output format, which emulate childnodes, then conversion from (or to) legacy childnodes will be easier.
is working on a reply...