Press Ctrl / CMD + C to copy this to your clipboard.
This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at
This seems like a regression of a bug that already was fixed in version 2: "Fix Value from Tags datatype doesn't get assigned"
I'm running CMSImport v3.2 on U6.2.5
I can see the tags being imported to the table cmsTags, but no entries are created in cmsTagRelationship.
If I create tags through the normal Umbraco backoffice UI everything works like it should.
I pretty much tried everything at this point and don't know of any new approach I could take.
Additional info: Tags are imported twice into cmsTags. I just did a small test with one document, with two tags in a csv. This results in 4 entries in cmsTags.
Hi Gijs,
CMSImport is using the Umbraco Tag object and I think that isn't creating the relation anymore in 6.2.5 :-(
Best,
Richard
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.
Continue discussion
Tags get imported in cmsTags but not in cmsTagRelationship
This seems like a regression of a bug that already was fixed in version 2: "Fix Value from Tags datatype doesn't get assigned"
I'm running CMSImport v3.2 on U6.2.5
I can see the tags being imported to the table cmsTags, but no entries are created in cmsTagRelationship.
If I create tags through the normal Umbraco backoffice UI everything works like it should.
I pretty much tried everything at this point and don't know of any new approach I could take.
Additional info: Tags are imported twice into cmsTags. I just did a small test with one document, with two tags in a csv. This results in 4 entries in cmsTags.
Hi Gijs,
CMSImport is using the Umbraco Tag object and I think that isn't creating the relation anymore in 6.2.5 :-(
Best,
Richard
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.