I know that one can restrict a umbraco node to a certain group of members (role). But I'm wondering, is there a way to configure so that all logged in members can see de node indepentent of there roles?
Thank you for fast feedback, I know that adding all members to a group would solve the issue but I was wondering if there is another way to do this. Like if we where using the login view, only loggin in would show the LoggedInTemplate, no need for roles.
<asp:LoginViewID="yada"runat="server"> <AnonymousTemplate> Not logged in </AnonymousTemplate> <LoggedInTemplate> Logged in </LoggedInTemplate> </asp:LoginView>
Is there a way to protect pages in "is user loggedin basis" or do I have to put them in a role?
However you could write a macro and add it to the page in question. The macro could check if there's not a logged in user and redirect to the login page.
Public Access without a role
Hi!
I know that one can restrict a umbraco node to a certain group of members (role). But I'm wondering, is there a way to configure so that all logged in members can see de node indepentent of there roles?
Hi Markus,
Create another role that all members have in addition to their first role. Then change the public permissions to allow access if the new role exists.
Cheers
Hi Chris!
Thank you for fast feedback, I know that adding all members to a group would solve the issue but I was wondering if there is another way to do this. Like if we where using the login view, only loggin in would show the LoggedInTemplate, no need for roles.
<asp:LoginViewID="yada"runat="server">
<AnonymousTemplate>
Not logged in
</AnonymousTemplate>
<LoggedInTemplate>
Logged in
</LoggedInTemplate>
</asp:LoginView>
Is there a way to protect pages in "is user loggedin basis" or do I have to put them in a role?
I don't think there's anything 'out the box'.
However you could write a macro and add it to the page in question. The macro could check if there's not a logged in user and redirect to the login page.
@Chris - Thank you. That's what I was thinking, to bad.. =/ I think I'll just add all of them to some group like "users" or something.
is working on a reply...