Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • René Nissen 15 posts 96 karma points
    Jun 19, 2013 @ 14:46
    René Nissen
    0

    Node properties have same id

    Hi Umbraco People

     

    I’m fairly new to Umbraco development and I’m stucked with a problem that I expected to be a simple task, because I get the same ids from two different node properties.

     

    I have a document type (name Frontpage – alias frontpage), which contains a number of properties. Two of those properties are content pickers that links to two internal pages with the ids 1268 and 1269.

     

    To get the urls of the content pickers, I have created a user control with the parameters DocTypeAlias (frontpageAlias) and NodePropertyAlias_ContentPicker (aliasPageA or aliasPageB). When I look up the node with the alias DocTypeAlias then I get the correct node having all the properties as expected, but I can see that both content picker properties has the value 1269 but both properties have the correct aliases - aliasPageA or aliasPageB

     

    I have checked the existence of the properties in the table cmsContent and they both exist with the correct text attached.

     

    Is it wrong to use content picker for this purpose? – and if so: What to do instead?

     

     

  • Jan Skovgaard 11280 posts 23678 karma points MVP 11x admin c-trib
    Jun 19, 2013 @ 19:17
    Jan Skovgaard
    0

    Hi René and welcome to our :)

    Your scenario sounds like one where it's a good idea to use a content picker - however it would be nice to see some of your code and if you could also let us know what version of Umbraco you're using it will make it a bit easier to give you some pointers.

    Looking forward to hearing from you.

    /Jan

  • René Nissen 15 posts 96 karma points
    Jun 19, 2013 @ 21:15
    René Nissen
    0

    Hi Jan and thanks for replying

     

    I use Umbraco 6.0.5 and here is my user control.

     

            public string DocTypeAlias { get; set; }

            public string NodeProperty_ContentPicker { get; set; }

            protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)

            {

                if (!Page.IsPostBack)

                {

                    GetUrl();

                }

            }

     

            private void GetUrl()

            {

                Node docTypeNode = GetNodeByAlias(DocTypeAlias);

     

                if (docTypeNode == null)

                {

                    return;

                }

     

                Property property = (Property)docTypeNode.PropertiesAsList.Find(x => x.Alias.ToLower() == NodeProperty_ContentPicker.ToLower());

                if (property != null)

                {

                    string url = string.Empty;

                    string pageName = string.Empty;

     

                    try

                    {

                        int propertyId = int.Parse(property.Value);

                        url = umbraco.library.NiceUrl(propertyId);

     

                        Node cpValue = new Node(propertyId);

                        if (cpValue != null)

                        {

                            pageName = cpValue.Name;

                        }

                    }

                    catch (Exception)

                    {

                        //Remember to log the error...

                    }

     

                    hyperLink.NavigateUrl = "~" + url;

                    hyperLink.Text = pageName;

                }

            }

    I really hope that you can enlighten me a little... 
  • René Nissen 15 posts 96 karma points
    Jun 20, 2013 @ 10:17
    René Nissen
    0

    I solved the problem by creating a new document type carrying the two content pickers only.

    By doing so my user control were able to read the properties correctly.

    As far as I can see, the records in the database looks similar, so I assume this is an undocumented Umbraco feature :-)

     

  • This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.

    You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.

Please Sign in or register to post replies