Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Ferdy Hoefakker 214 posts 248 karma points
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 12:35
    Ferdy Hoefakker
    0

    section block size

    Silly question, but is it possible to change the size of the section block? Or at the very least adding a scroll function to it? If you have a lot of sections, some of them will fall off, which is rather annoying.

    -Ferdy

  • Lee Kelleher 4026 posts 15836 karma points MVP 13x admin c-trib
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 13:06
    Lee Kelleher
    0

    Hi Ferdy,

    Do you mean the section block at the bottom-right of the Umbraco back-office?

    If so, unfortunately its currently a fixed height, with no scrolling - so if you have too many section icons in there, then the last ones will disappear.

    Feel free to raise an issue on CodePlex: http://umbraco.codeplex.com/WorkItem/Create

    Cheers, Lee.

  • Ferdy Hoefakker 214 posts 248 karma points
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 16:28
    Ferdy Hoefakker
    0

    It's the bottom-left Lee, but yes, that's the one I mean ;)

    Oh well, that;s a real shame. Do you know why this was done? It seems like a rather weird choice to me, especially since you can't make the buttons smaller.

    -Ferdy

  • Lee Kelleher 4026 posts 15836 karma points MVP 13x admin c-trib
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 16:35
    Lee Kelleher
    0

    Hi Ferdy,

    Trust me to confuse my lefts & rights ... DOH!

    I found a way to do it manually...

    Open the CSS file: "\umbraco\css\umbracoGui.css" fine the rule for "#PlaceHolderAppIcons_content" (line 73 in Umbraco 4.7-beta), change the "overflow" to "auto".

    #PlaceHolderAppIcons_content
    {
        overflow: auto;
    }

    That will give you scrollbars if the sections box is too small.

    Cheers, Lee.

  • Ferdy Hoefakker 214 posts 248 karma points
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 18:00
    Ferdy Hoefakker
    0

    I'll try it first thing tomorrow! Thanks!

    -Ferdy

  • Lee Kelleher 4026 posts 15836 karma points MVP 13x admin c-trib
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 18:13
    Lee Kelleher
    0

    I've taken the liberty of submitting a patch to the core ... so you never know it might make it into v4.7 (but don't hold your breath - there's probably a reason why it was set to "overflow: hidden").

    Cheers, Lee.

  • Lee Kelleher 4026 posts 15836 karma points MVP 13x admin c-trib
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 18:14
    Lee Kelleher
    0

    Noticed that you raised a ticket on CodePlex, good man! :-)

    http://umbraco.codeplex.com/workitem/30088

  • Laurence Gillian 600 posts 1219 karma points
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 19:01
    Laurence Gillian
    1

    Overflow: auto; is a pretty ugly way of doing this! The way the size gets set makes my mind boggle a little bit, but looking at it you could make it expanding upwards. 

    Maybe you boys should chill out on the Sections a little bit? :P

  • Ferdy Hoefakker 214 posts 248 karma points
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 19:04
    Ferdy Hoefakker
    0

    For this case that's not an option Laurence. We need pretty much all the default Umbraco sections, and a lot of custom stuff. It's going to be used by a large franchise corporation and they want a lot of stuff under it's own section to make it more easily identifiable from other options within the system.

    -Ferdy

  • Lee Kelleher 4026 posts 15836 karma points MVP 13x admin c-trib
    Feb 28, 2011 @ 19:09
    Lee Kelleher
    0
    Overflow: auto; is a pretty ugly way of doing this!

    Wa-wa-what? :-o :-0 :-O *shock*  Surely "overflow:auto" can't be that ugly... it's prettier than "overflow:scroll" and certain better than "overflow:hidden"! ;-)

    I agree about the craziness of way the heights/widths are set in the back-office - makes my head hurt too.

    Consider me chilled out.

    Peace, Lee.

     

  • Niels Hartvig 1951 posts 2391 karma points c-trib
    Mar 02, 2011 @ 21:18
    Niels Hartvig
    0

    Yeah, the way the whole back office do it's panels is old code from how to handle cross browser crazyness seven years ago. And it has worked, so don't fix it. Until v5 that is - thank god :-)

    I agree with Lee that the solution in v4.x seems fine, why not add it as default, @laurence?

  • Laurence Gillian 600 posts 1219 karma points
    Mar 03, 2011 @ 11:51
    Laurence Gillian
    0

    Yep I agree, it should as default.

    It's still pretty ugly though! ;)  

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft