Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • gresziu 4 posts 24 karma points
    Nov 01, 2012 @ 15:32
    gresziu
    0

    Style (.css) missing when added Azure Cloud Project

    Hi,

    I'm in my way to convert an Umbraco web site to Azure Cloud Service Project, but when I add this cloud project and debug my the project, the web page is missing all the styling, i.e. all the tabs in one page. I have seen that doesn't take the .css nad neither images.

    Someone knows what's happening here? Thanks!

  • Mark Bennett 199 posts 375 karma points
    Nov 01, 2012 @ 15:35
    Mark Bennett
    0

    The site has a different directory root so the reference to the css file is broken? You have a link to the website and i'll take a look?

  • gresziu 4 posts 24 karma points
    Nov 01, 2012 @ 15:59
    gresziu
    0

    Hi Mark,

    Thanks for the answer, I don't have an external link becuase this happens just when I debug in VS with the cloud project.

    When I publish the project to Azure it works fine, with the .css and images. So that's why I'm thinking that the references are good.

  • Mark Bennett 199 posts 375 karma points
    Nov 01, 2012 @ 16:45
    Mark Bennett
    0

    I've not tried any debugging with cloud based services so I can't comment. But I agree that if it's all good when published then something screwy is going on with the references when debugging.

    Might be some options in the debug tab within the project properties but I don't really know enough about debugging in the cloud.

    This was on stack overflow though and might help?

  • gresziu 4 posts 24 karma points
    Nov 01, 2012 @ 17:01
    gresziu
    0

    Ok, thank you anyway. I have double check the config files and I think is all fine.

    This is my post also, but I tough was better come to this forum that people is more specialized in Umbraco, and hopefully this has happen to someone.

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft