We have just start work on an Umbraco 6 project that requires us to use SAML protocol to interface with a security provider. After having a brief Googling session there doesn't seem to be any kind of recent work with Umbraco using a SAML based membership provider. If anyone reading this knows of any projects or good examples of SAML and Umbraco implementation - if you could post your info that would be super!
The only real Umbraco and SAML thing I have found so far:
SAML and Umbraco
Hi guys!
We have just start work on an Umbraco 6 project that requires us to use SAML protocol to interface with a security provider. After having a brief Googling session there doesn't seem to be any kind of recent work with Umbraco using a SAML based membership provider. If anyone reading this knows of any projects or good examples of SAML and Umbraco implementation - if you could post your info that would be super!
The only real Umbraco and SAML thing I have found so far:
http://digitaliser.dk/group/404609
Cheers
Jacob
Didn't mean to post twice! (sorry!)
Hi Jacob,
Did you find any resources?
Matt
Did any find a solution to this?
Not me as my project didn't go ahead.
We did get SAML working with Umbraco. Basically involved us writing our own membership provider. Any specifics you want to ask about?
I am currently getting this exception: "System.ServiceModel.FaultException: ID3082: The request scope is not valid or is unsupported."
I can't figure out how to solve this exception - The code I use is pasted in below.
Is there any particular reason you are doing this logic in the view? This looks like it should be further up in the request pipeline.
No not really - It's just a quick and dirty test!
Got it to work though! There was an issue on the identity provider server.
Yeah that's something we experienced with our client. A lot of the issues came from the configuration setup of the providing server.
Hi guys,
is the code coming from this link: http://digitaliser.dk/group/404609 still applicable to umbraco 7.3 or later?
thanks!
is working on a reply...