maybe I just found something...

var mymember = Member.GetCurrentMember();
 var test = mymember.HasProperty("logo");

that returned true - and I can get the property with mymember.getProperty("logo").Value

that was what i wanted... - happy days :-)

and I can use this as well:
mymember.Email
.Id

and another custom property with the getProperty method

But what about the Name - and other properties?

/Michael

Hi Michael,

You could do something like

var mymember = Member.GetCurrentMember();

var userName = mymember.getProperty("Name").Value.ToString();
<p>@userName</p>

strange - that gives an error..

Error loading MacroEngine script

Can you post the whole code ?

i used
var mymember =Member.GetCurrentMember();

var userName = mymember.getProperty("Name").Value.ToString();

But I now use this - and it works:
@using umbraco.cms.businesslogic.member
@{

 
 var mymember = Member.GetCurrentMember();
 var userName = mymember.Text;
 <span>@userName</span>
 
}  

But I think its strange that properties cant be accessed the same way.

Isnt there some doc. on using Members from Razor (or xsl)

/Mic

Do you have those namespace in your razor file ?

@using umbraco.cms.businesslogic.member
@using System.Web 
@using System.Web.Security

only the first one actually... - is that the trick?

Yes it should get you working...

Hi all, 

these methods dont work in my address.cshtml file, why do you think so?

thanks

getProperty andvar mymember =Member.GetCurrentMember()

@usingUCommerce.Api
@usingumbraco.cms.businesslogic.member
@usingSystem.Web  
@usingSystem.Web.Security
@usingUCommerce.EntitiesV2
@usingUCommerce.Extensions
@usingUCommerce.Runtime
@usingumbraco.MacroEngines

Member m =Member.GetCurrentMember();

var city= member.getProperty("city").

Hi Ezgi

What version of Umbraco are you using? If it's 4.11 and you're using MVC razor you perhaps need to do it in another way. The thing is that currently there is macroscript Razor and MVC razor implementations...so what you can do with one implementation may not work with another implementation...

So it's important to know :)

Looking forward to hearing from you.

/Jan

is working on a reply...