I was trying to compare performance between razor and xslt, but I always get rather much overhead for my xslt macros loading xsltextensions, and especially for Exslt.ExsltCommon. This is making a comparison very hard.
For the site I'm running my tests on loading ExsltCommon takes 0.15 seconds. (For each xslt macro). And for a smaller site I get 0.07 secs for ExsltCommon. (I'm using ?umbdebugshowtrace=1 to look at the timings).
Is this normal, or did I miss some optimization? On a site with many visitors (and many xslts) this should be rather problematic, no?
Optimize xslt performance Xslt
Hi!
I was trying to compare performance between razor and xslt, but I always get rather much overhead for my xslt macros loading xsltextensions, and especially for Exslt.ExsltCommon. This is making a comparison very hard.
For the site I'm running my tests on loading ExsltCommon takes 0.15 seconds. (For each xslt macro). And for a smaller site I get 0.07 secs for ExsltCommon. (I'm using ?umbdebugshowtrace=1 to look at the timings).
Is this normal, or did I miss some optimization? On a site with many visitors (and many xslts) this should be rather problematic, no?
Regards
Jonas
Are you using 4.6.1? If so perhaps it's this bug: http://umbraco.codeplex.com/workitem/29966.
Jeroen
Ah, yes it was thanks!
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.