Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • rajeev 18 posts 38 karma points
    Feb 22, 2011 @ 12:37
    rajeev
    0

    How to get node property in umbraco 4.6.1

    <xsl:value-of select="$currentPage/descendant::node[@nodeTypeAlias='product']/@id"/>

    return nothing on the root node in umbraco version 4.6.1

    I think this issue is becouse of the version.

    Please suggest me what would be change in above xslt  to get the product node property

    Structure

    Home

             Product

            News

     

     

  • Chriztian Steinmeier 2800 posts 8791 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    Feb 22, 2011 @ 12:46
    Chriztian Steinmeier
    1

    Hi rajeev,

    The new XML Schema (search for it here on Our) is a lot simpler - your snippet looks like this:

    <xsl:value-of select="$currentPage/descendant::product[@isDoc]/@id" />

    Make sure to get the casing right - if the alias is "Product" you need to use that

    /Chriztian

  • Jan Skovgaard 11280 posts 23678 karma points MVP 11x admin c-trib
    Feb 22, 2011 @ 12:49
    Jan Skovgaard
    1

    Hi Rajeev

    That's because the sample you're using is for the legacy XML schema. (Since v4.5 of Umbraco the XML schema has changed - the syntax you're using is pre v.4.5)

    To see the XML structure you're trying to match make a copy-of like this

    <textarea>

    <xsl:copy-of select="$currentPage/descendant::*[@isDoc]" />

    </textarea>

    This should give you a notion of the structure.

    In the sample I think you could actually do something like this since you only want the specific document type of "product", right?

    <xsl:value-of select="$currentPage/product/@id />

    Does this help?

    /Jan

  • Jan Skovgaard 11280 posts 23678 karma points MVP 11x admin c-trib
    Feb 22, 2011 @ 12:49
    Jan Skovgaard
    0

    Beaten by the majestro once again, you rock Chriztian ;-)

    /Jan

  • Chriztian Steinmeier 2800 posts 8791 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    Feb 22, 2011 @ 12:58
    Chriztian Steinmeier
    0

    Your explanation was more detailed, though - I just opted for the close-to-LMGTFY solution :-)

    /Chriztian

    PS: With your current karma-score I wouldn't necessarily call it "beaten" either... :-)

  • rajeev 18 posts 38 karma points
    Feb 26, 2011 @ 02:46
    rajeev
    0

    Thanks for everyone. Both solutions of Crhiztian and  Jan were very helipful for me.

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft