Sign in Register
Go to solution
Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Dwayne A 97 posts 117 karma points
    Mar 07, 2011 @ 09:09
    Dwayne A
    0

    GetMedia after page id

    Hi,

    Am working on a navigational menu requiring both text links as well as images associated with eah page. The text links work fine, but I am stumped after trying to assosiate the images with the page link.

    The navi should work like this: http://www.koriaarhus.dk/

    My code:

    <xsl:param name="currentPage"/>

        <xsl:template match="/">
          <xsl:variable name="siteRoot" select="$currentPage/ancestor-or-self::* [@level=1]" />     
            <xsl:variable name="mainMenuItems" select="$siteRoot /*[@isDoc and string(umbracoNaviHide) != '1']" />
              <xsl:apply-templates select="$mainMenuItems" />
        </xsl:template>

        <xsl:template name="ShowMenuItem" match="*">
          <div style="float:left; width:87px; padding-left:12px; padding-top:7px;">
            <p class="link_paragraf">
              <a href="{umbraco.library:NiceUrl(@id)}" class="menulink">
                <xsl:variable name="mediaID" select="$currentPage/linkBillede" />
                <xsl:if test="string($mediaID) != ''">
                  <xsl:variable name="media" select="umbraco.library:GetMedia($currentPage/linkBillede, false)" />
                    <xsl:if test="string($media) != ''">
                    <img src="{$media/umbracoFile}" alt="{$media/altText}" class="image" />
                    </xsl:if>
                </xsl:if>
                <xsl:value-of select="@nodeName"/>
              </a>
            </p>
          </div>
        </xsl:template>

     

    Copy Link
  • Kim Andersen 1447 posts 2196 karma points MVP
    Mar 07, 2011 @ 10:02
    Kim Andersen
    1

    Hi Dwayne

    Could you try to change this:

    <xsl:variable name="mediaID" select="$currentPage/linkBillede" />
                <xsl:if test="string($mediaID) != ''">
                  <xsl:variable name="media" select="umbraco.library:GetMedia($currentPage/linkBillede, false)" />
                    <xsl:if test="string($media) != ''">
                    <img src="{$media/umbracoFile}" alt="{$media/altText}" class="image" />
                    </xsl:if>
                </xsl:if>

    To this:

    <xsl:variable name="mediaID" select="./linkBillede" />
                <xsl:if test="string($mediaID) != ''">
                  <xsl:variable name="media" select="umbraco.library:GetMedia($mediaID, false)" />
                    <xsl:if test="string($media) != ''">
                    <img src="{$media/umbracoFile}" alt="{$media/altText}" class="image" />
                    </xsl:if>
                </xsl:if>

    Does that make any difference?

    /Kim A

    Copy Link
  • Dwayne A 97 posts 117 karma points
    Mar 07, 2011 @ 10:44
    Dwayne A
    0

    That did the trick! You addressed the top node with ./linkBillede, correct? And then called the variable mediaID instead of currentPage/linkBillede.

    Copy Link
  • Kim Andersen 1447 posts 2196 karma points MVP
    Mar 07, 2011 @ 10:48
    Kim Andersen
    0

    Yeah, you where trying to grab the linkBillede from the current page (by using $currentPage), but it should really grab it from the current node that's been iterated through (by using . instead - actually you could probably remove the ./ in front of the linkBillede as well).

    And then I just used the id we found in the $MediaID inside the GetMedia-extension in the $media-variable :)

    /Kim A

    Copy Link
  • Dwayne A 97 posts 117 karma points
    Mar 07, 2011 @ 10:58
    Dwayne A
    0

    Exactly. I knew I was not addressing the proper nodes, rather the current page loaded in the browser. I was just uncertain how to address the page node associated with my images. So in order to grab the image from the iterated pages, we create a variable for the property, select the iteration at the top node and pass the property into GetMedia(), it would seem. And you are correct, it works without ./

    Copy Link
Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft