Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Matt Bliss 176 posts 234 karma points c-trib
    Jan 11, 2013 @ 17:39
    Matt Bliss
    0

    XSLT Performance Issue

     

    I'm posting this on behalf of Brendan Rice - Matt Bliss

    I have a performance issue in an XSLT file that I am finding it tricky to track down.

    The XSLT is based off Doug's excellent XSLTsearch package XSLT file and the performance issues seem to creep in before the "After performing transformation" trace log (see below it takes 2.4 seconds).

    There are a few modifications to the script so it is likely one of them causing it.

    Has anyone got any tips or pointers of how best to go about putting log messages in the script to get timings from the trace to help pinpoint where the time is being sucked up?

    umbracoXsltExtension

    Extension added: urn:PS.XSLTsearch, XSLTsearch

    1.135309

    0.000013

    umbracoMacro

    After adding extensions

    1.135318

    0.000008

    umbracoMacro

    Before performing transformation

    1.135351

    0.000033

    SearchHelper

    1. Pre Query

    1.136304

    0.000954

    SearchHelper

    2. jobsRegion

    1.136346

    0.000042

    SearchHelper

    3. jobSector

    1.136358

    0.000012

    SearchHelper

    4. jobDegree

    1.136375

    0.000017

    SearchHelper

    5. jobType

    1.136385

    0.000010

    SearchHelper

    6. sortXpath

    1.136397

    0.000012

    SearchHelper

    Post Query 1

    1.544537

    0.408140

    SearchHelper

    Post Query 1 - Query//descendant-or-self::* [@isDoc and @id='28188' ]/descendant-or-self::* [@isDoc and (name() = 'MyPage') and isClosed !='1' and (number(variable1) >= number('0') and number(variable1) < number('9999999'))]

    1.544589

    0.000052

    SearchHelper

    Post Query 1 - Count - 257

    1.786802

    0.242213

    umbracoMacro

    After performing transformation

    4.218481

    2.431680

     

  • Brendan Rice 538 posts 1101 karma points
    Jan 11, 2013 @ 17:41
    Brendan Rice
    0

    Thanks for posting this for me Matt, really appreciate the help

  • Chriztian Steinmeier 2798 posts 8788 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    Jan 11, 2013 @ 18:47
    Chriztian Steinmeier
    0

    Hi Brendan & Matt,

    It's very likely due to some XPath queries going through way more nodes than necessary. Could you post a link to the XSLT (Gist/Pastebin) maybe?

    You might also have a look at using keys to solve the problem: http://our.umbraco.org/forum/developers/xslt/35132-Slow-node-selection-with-large-amount-of-nodes

    /Chriztian

  • Brendan Rice 538 posts 1101 karma points
    Jan 11, 2013 @ 20:44
    Brendan Rice
    0

    Hi Chriztian,

    thanks for replying, XSLT is in the gist URL below:

    https://gist.github.com/4513384

    there is a call to an extension on 113 but I pretty sure that isn't what is slowing down the XSLT as that is what 1-6 in the trace is recording.

    Any help would be great, thanks again for taking the time.

    B

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft