Press Ctrl / CMD + C to copy this to your clipboard.
This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at
Hi,
When I moved our site from iis 6.0 to iis 7.0 server, i'm encountering this error.
The configuration section 'system.web.extensions' cannot be read because it
is missing a section declaration
< system.web.extensions>< scripting>< scriptResourceHandler enableCompression="true" enableCaching="true" />< webServices>< jsonSerialization maxJsonLength="500000" /></ webServices></ scripting></ system.web.extensions>
<
system.web.extensions>
scripting>
scriptResourceHandler enableCompression="true" enableCaching="true" />
webServices>
jsonSerialization maxJsonLength="500000" />
</
Do you think it is safe to remove the systems.web.extensions section in my web.config?
Think you need to switch to an App_Pool that supports .net 2.0. Check out this article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731755%28v=ws.10%29.aspx ;
I assume you are running Umbraco 4.5 in this situation.
Cheers,
Richard
actually i'm running 4.6 and using .net 4.0.
The link is not working. It's returning a page can't be found error.
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.
Continue discussion
installing umbraco site to iis 7
Hi,
When I moved our site from iis 6.0 to iis 7.0 server, i'm encountering this error.
Do you think it is safe to remove the systems.web.extensions section in my web.config?
Think you need to switch to an App_Pool that supports .net 2.0. Check out this article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731755%28v=ws.10%29.aspx ;
I assume you are running Umbraco 4.5 in this situation.
Cheers,
Richard
actually i'm running 4.6 and using .net 4.0.
The link is not working. It's returning a page can't be found error.
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.