Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Sebastian Dammark 583 posts 1407 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 14:29
    Sebastian Dammark
    0

    Any kind of crash log

    I have a solution running in a shared environment, and according to the hosting it causes the app pool to crash.
    But unfortunately they cannot provide me with any detailed description of what is happening.

    Is there any kind of way I can log what's going on ?

    I'm not a C# developer, just a simple frontender.

  • Rich Green 2246 posts 4008 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 14:46
    Rich Green
    0

    You can install http://our.umbraco.org/projects/backoffice-extensions/falm-housekeeping and view the Umbraco logs via the Umbraco interface.

    The hosting provider should have access to the windows logs related to your app pool.

    Rich


  • Sebastian Dammark 583 posts 1407 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 15:01
    Sebastian Dammark
    0

    I can't even install a package since the website is completely down.
    My only option is to get a complete backup and get it running locally so I can keep an eye on it.

    The hosting provider gave me this:

    Fault bucket , type 0
    Event Name: APPCRASH
    Response: Not available
    Cab Id: 0
    
    Problem signature:
    P1: w3wp.exe
    P2: 7.5.7600.16385
    P3: 4a5bcd2b
    P4: clr.dll
    P5: 4.0.30319.225
    P6: 4d53688b
    P7: c00000fd
    P8: 00001ac6
    P9: 
    P10: 
    
    Attached files:
    C:\Windows\Temp\WER870A.tmp.appcompat.txt
    C:\Windows\Temp\WER8778.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
    C:\Windows\Temp\WER8779.tmp.hdmp
    C:\Windows\Temp\WERBC8E.tmp.mdmp
    
    These files may be available here:
    C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportQueue\AppCrash_w3wp.exe_40bf615d915ce0c0542cceabb829d8592c368fd9_cab_7e4abfc6
    
    Analysis symbol: 
    Rechecking for solution: 0
    Report Id: 0fff1082-8533-11e0-99d1-5c260afc8bfe
    Report Status: 4
    
    ----
    
    Faulting application name: w3wp.exe, version: 7.5.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bcd2b
    Faulting module name: clr.dll, version: 4.0.30319.225, time stamp: 0x4d53688b
    Exception code: 0xc00000fd
    Fault offset: 0x00001ac6
    Faulting process id: 0x17484
    Faulting application start time: 0x01cc193fcfd95799
    Faulting application path: C:\Windows\SysWOW64\inetsrv\w3wp.exe
    Faulting module path: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\clr.dll
    Report Id: 0fff1082-8533-11e0-99d1-5c260afc8bfe
  • aghy 129 posts 308 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 15:17
    aghy
    0

    Hi Sebastian,

    Did you have a fully working website? If so do you remember all the packages you installed?

    If you used an sql database or mysql then you could try checking your umbraco log table. It may give us more information to work out what is going on.

    When I first started using my shared hosting I kept forgetting to change the framework version that the apppool used and so it would crash and completely lock me out and the only way I could fix it was to rename the web.config file using ftp.

    Ben

  • Sebastian Dammark 583 posts 1407 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 17:14
    Sebastian Dammark
    0

    So I've been looking in the log table and to me it looks pretty ok except for the huge amount of login/logout posts.
    The client called me today at 13:32 asking if I was messing around, I wasn't, and the site has been down since.

    The logs starts at 13.00 today until now

    Can anyone see if there is something wrong out of this. Any help would be appreciated

    I've made 2 log files, with and without login/logout posts.

    umbracolog with login/logout

    umbracolog without login/logout

  • webmonger 130 posts 285 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 17:22
    webmonger
    0

    I've experienced this in the past with XSLT scripts that end up in never ending loops. Basically they continue to run up the quantity of memory they use and the app pool recycles, then it happens again and again and the app pool does what it should and switches it's self off and you get the Service Unavailable message

    I cant remember exact code for when this happens but if you run the site locally and hit all the pages sooner or later this issue raises it's head and at that point you should know what page it's on.

  • Rich Green 2246 posts 4008 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 17:33
    Rich Green
    1

    I experienced this the other day in an XSLT file when using apply-templates

    This code would kill the App Pool from time to time, once the App pool was down I cold restart it but it would still just crash the app pool again

    <xsl:template match="value" mode="content">
        <xsl:if test="normalize-space()">
          <xsl:apply-templates select="umbraco.library:GetXmlNodeById(text())" />
        </xsl:if>
    </xsl:template>
    
      <xsl:template match="*[@isDoc]">
        <!--This match here would sometimes crash the app pool-->
        Render the content
      </xsl:template>

    This code has been fine

    <xsl:template match="value" mode="content">
        <xsl:if test="normalize-space()">
          <!--Rendering the content here without apply-templates has been fine-->
        </xsl:if>
    </xsl:template>

    This happen on sites which were running fine until a few nodes were deleted, then the App Pool crashes happened (using the Apply Templates code)

    Rich

  • Sebastian Dammark 583 posts 1407 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 17:59
    Sebastian Dammark
    0

    So far so good.
    It seems, as you guys say, to be my XSLT that's fucked up.

    Let the digging begin ;)

    Thanx alot for your help guys

  • Rich Green 2246 posts 4008 karma points
    May 23, 2011 @ 18:02
    Rich Green
    0

    Technically the XSLT above is fine, so if you find any XSLT that's causing the problem please post it back here as it may be a bug with Umbraco which needs to be reported.

    Rich

  • Chriztian Steinmeier 2798 posts 8788 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    May 23, 2011 @ 22:34
    Chriztian Steinmeier
    1

    Hi all,

    Here's a scenario that will cause an infinite loop: You have a simple template that matches Media "Image" elements, and then you do this:

    <xsl:template match="/">
        <!-- Should return an <Image> element -->
        <xsl:apply-templates select="umbraco.library:GetMedia(/macro/pageImage, false())"/>
    </xsl:template>
    
    <!-- Template for images -->
    <xsl:template match="Image">
        <img src="{umbracoFile}" width="{umbracoWidth}" />
    </xsl:template> 

    This works great, as long as there exist a media Image with the requested id (in the macro parameter pageImage) - the GetMedia() call returns an XML chunk like this:

    <Image id="1239" nodeName="..." ...>
        <umbracoFile>/media/76293/filename.png</umbracoFile>
        <umbracoWidth>230</umbracoWidth>
        ...
    </Image>

    But if the media item is deleted (or the id just doesn't exist), the GetMedia() call will return a chunk of XML that looks like this:

    <error>No media is maching '1239'</error> 

    (Yes, complete with the typo and all :-) - but the problem is that the XPathNodeIterator (or so I'm told it's called) isn't pointing to the <error> element, rather, it points to the document element, which means that the template that gets applied is the root template - the one matching "/", which in turn calls GetMedia() once again, and then there goes the memory...

    You can circumvent this by making sure only to apply templates to the returned node if it doesn't have an error element, like this:

    <xsl:variable name="mediaNode" select="umbraco.library:GetMedia(/macro/pageImage, false())" />
    <xsl:apply-templates select="$mediaNode[not(error)]" />

     

    /Chriztian

  • Sebastian Dammark 583 posts 1407 karma points
    May 24, 2011 @ 20:49
    Sebastian Dammark
    1

    Great post Chriz ... thanx alot.

    This was excatly the problem ... ;)

    My biggest problem, right now, is actually that I don't have a local test server.
    Everytime I send the webserver into a loop, while debugging, I have to wait 29 minutes before the app pool recycles.

    So I think I'll give my girlfriend an iPad 2 and then convert her Mac mini to my test server.

  • Chriztian Steinmeier 2798 posts 8788 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    May 24, 2011 @ 21:18
    Chriztian Steinmeier
    0

    Sounds like an excellent idea :-)

    /Chriztian

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft