Hi All,

just to upgrade , I can see in SQl profiler that following query is being fired contineously and the result is nothing ..

exec sp_executesql N'select distinct nodeId from cmsDocument where newest = 1 and not expireDate is null and expireDate <= @today',N'@today datetime',@today='2012-07-24 12:03:41.407'

Do I need to set something in DB / config to indicate that we are doing an upgrade and needs database upgrading as well.

Cheers

Aysha

I did upgrade one site to 4.8.0. AFAIK, there are no DB upgrades from 4.7.1.1 to 4.8.0...

Thanks for your reply. If thats the case then why do I get errors when I finish the  wizard and try to click on any content node.

I get followin errors :

Value cannot be null.
Parameter name: Property browserTitle (35) on Content Type Root could not be retrieved for Document 1136 on Tab Page Meta. To fix this problem, delete the property and recreate it.

Your help is really appreaciated.

Cheers

Aysha

Root Document type has a property called browserTitle of Meta Type.

Well first of all, that error has nothing to do with the DB upgrade.
When I get that error, my first solution is to touch the web.config.
If that doesn't work, I look in Document Types what the Datatype for the property is. Looks like Textstring in your case?
Then I go to Developer -> Datatypes and try to select the datatype. It could give you an error which is more obvious to fix. 

Hi kipusoep

Thanks for your reply. Yes there was problem with the User controls dll and other third party dlls.

Just one more question, If I try to goto website again after completing the wizard, it asks me umbraco login and start the upgrade wizard again and again.

Why is it starting the wizard again once it has completed the wizrd.

Your help really appreaciated.

Thanks

Aysha

Hi kipusoep

Thanks for all your help.

it works like a charm now ;-)

Aysha

No problem :-)

Hi Aysha,

I  upgraded an existing Umbraco site from 4.7 to 4.8 and merged  the following files

• /app_data
• /app_browsers
• /app_code
• /bin
• /config
• /data
• /install
• /umbraco
• /umbraco_client
• web.config
• default.aspx

as mentioned in 

our.umbraco.org/.../upgrading-an-umbraco-installation

But i couldnt get a database upgrade wizard when i go to my website. Also all the xslt is parsing error.  Also when  selecting the content node i'm getting the following error 

Value cannot be null.
Parameter name: Property browserTitle_gb (28) on Content Type StandardPage could not be retrieved for Document 1248 on Tab Page Meta Data. To fix this problem, delete the property and recreate it.

And when i select that datatype i'm getting the following error:

Could not find a IDataType control matching DataEditorId b8a9a4e8-73f8-4f4a-a1ee-3f64053654b3 in the controls collection. To correct this, check the data type definition in the developer section or ensure that the package/control is installed correctly

Could anyone please help.

Thanks

Hi Muhammed

look in Document Types what the Datatype for the property?
Then go to Developer -> Datatypes and try to select the datatype. It could give you an error which is more obvious to fix.

also check the user controls are placed in the right folder structure and selected in develoer->datatypes-> control section

Thanks aysha. It was because older uComponents compiles against the older version of lucene.Net (v2.9.2.2),  by adding the following  XML snippet to web.config resolved the issue.

<assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">

        <dependentAssembly>

                <assemblyIdentity name="Lucene.Net" />

                <codeBase version="2.9.2.2" href="bin\legacy\Lucene.Net.dll" />

                <codeBase version="2.9.4.1" href="bin\Lucene.Net.dll" />

        </dependentAssembly>

</assemblyBinding>

Thanks Muhammed, solved my problem. Seems some spaces were omitted in your XML. For reference, here is how it should look.

<assemblyIdentity name="Lucene.Net"/>
  <codeBase version="2.9.2.2" href="bin\legacy\Lucene.Net.dll"/>
  <codeBase version="2.9.4.1" href="bin\Lucene.Net.dll"/>
</dependentAssembly>

Hi Vold ,

Ok. That sounds good. 

thanks, i have corrected it.

is working on a reply...