Two "packages" nodes after upgrading from 4.11.5 to 6.0.2
After upgrading from 4.11.5 to 6.0, I have two "packages" nodes and two "relation types" nodes in the developer section. When I restore to 4.11.5, everything looks okay. I have no packages installed on 4.11.5. Any ideas what I could have missed or how to correct?
Try having a look in the trees.config file and see if the mentioned areas are listed in there 2 times. If so then you can delete one of them so you won't see any duplicates.
It seems to have corrected itself. When I logged into the back office to validate the trees.config against what was being displayed, I noticed that the duplicates were gone.
Ok, then it's probably been some sort of caching "issue" :). I saw the exact same thing in an install I upgraded last week as well. So when you see this it's either a matter of just doing a "refresh" of the browser window or checking the trees.config file to see if there are any duplicates in there.
Two "packages" nodes after upgrading from 4.11.5 to 6.0.2
After upgrading from 4.11.5 to 6.0, I have two "packages" nodes and two "relation types" nodes in the developer section. When I restore to 4.11.5, everything looks okay. I have no packages installed on 4.11.5. Any ideas what I could have missed or how to correct?
Thanks.
Hi Jimmy
Try having a look in the trees.config file and see if the mentioned areas are listed in there 2 times. If so then you can delete one of them so you won't see any duplicates.
Hope this helps.
/Jan
Thanks Jan
It seems to have corrected itself. When I logged into the back office to validate the trees.config against what was being displayed, I noticed that the duplicates were gone.
Thanks for your help.
Jimmy
Hi Jimmy
Ok, then it's probably been some sort of caching "issue" :). I saw the exact same thing in an install I upgraded last week as well. So when you see this it's either a matter of just doing a "refresh" of the browser window or checking the trees.config file to see if there are any duplicates in there.
/Jan
is working on a reply...