Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 05, 2015 @ 12:34
    Tom Engan
    0

    Upgrade from 7.2.8 to 7.3.0 - can save only one time, must refresh.

    After upgrading from 7.2.8 to 7.3.0 with two different installations, both upgrades have that problem that I can only save once at a time every time I've done some changes in scripts etc. I have to refresh the page again every single time after one saving!

    Very annoying. Anyone know how this can be fixed?

  • Martin 278 posts 661 karma points
    Oct 05, 2015 @ 13:27
    Martin
    0

    Yeah i'm experiencing the same on a clean install. I can't save more than once in the partial scripts. Same result using different browsers.

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 06, 2015 @ 08:30
    Tom Engan
    0

    The problem always occur on "Partial View Macro Files" and "Partial Views".

    And <add key = "umbracoTimeOutInMinutes" value = "120" /> does not work anymore. Could there be a correlation here?

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 06, 2015 @ 14:28
    Tom Engan
    0

    Sometime I get this when trying to update in "Partial Views": enter image description here

    Cant find any umbraco\backoffice directory..

    UPDATE: This sometimes happens when debug="true" in web.config.

  • Robin Nicholl 137 posts 277 karma points
    Oct 06, 2015 @ 14:45
    Robin Nicholl
    0

    Yes, I'm getting this too. Very annoying and, along with many other problems, makes me wonder if 7.3 is really ready yet…

  • Nathan Sleigh 109 posts 353 karma points
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 08:34
    Nathan Sleigh
    0

    Hi guys,

    Has anyone found a solution to this yet

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 10:27
    Tom Engan
    0

    I've not. Looks like a significant bug in 7.3.0. Hope this can be fixed soon with a new update. My assignment comes to an end soon, and I would like to finish it with a more stable version of Umbraco.

  • Tommy Enger 71 posts 276 karma points c-trib
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 12:03
    Tommy Enger
    0

    Did you add this to the issue tracker? We experience the same issue. This error gets logged in the console: enter image description here

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 12:13
    Tom Engan
    0

    No, I havn't add it to the issue tracker (maybe because I'm still not sure if it's an issue). Someone with experience adding issues must feel free perform this task :-)

  • Tommy Enger 71 posts 276 karma points c-trib
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 13:22
  • Sebastiaan Janssen 4941 posts 14781 karma points MVP admin hq
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 13:31
    Sebastiaan Janssen
    0

    @Robin Yes, it's really ready :-)

    The workaround is either to refresh or click on another node in the tree and then click on the partial you were editing again. Super annoying but not a showstopper, we'll get it fixed in 7.3.1 due out in a few weeks!

    Thanks Tommy for the report on the issue tracker with clear repro steps, helps a lot!

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 14:51
    Tom Engan
    0

    Do you think there is a correlation with this only-one-time-save-error, and the 404 message in the back office I sometimes get when debug="true" in the web.config? enter image description here and that neither timeout in web.config longer works?

    <add key = "umbracoTimeOutInMinutes" value = "120" />
    

    (the umbracoTimeOutInMinutes configuration changes nothing like in 7.2.8, and I can't either find any umbraco/backoffice directory).

  • Sebastiaan Janssen 4941 posts 14781 karma points MVP admin hq
    Oct 07, 2015 @ 14:58
    Sebastiaan Janssen
    0

    No, that is not related at all.

    I think you need to change the version in your ClientDependency.config (just make the version one higher or lower than it currently is). If that doesn't help then you need to thoroughly clear your browser cache (note that Chrome has notoriously aggressive caching).

    Also see: https://our.umbraco.org/forum/umbraco-7/using-umbraco-7/47920-BUG-umbracoUmbracoApi-Routing-returning-404s-post-upgrade-from-71-to-72

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Oct 08, 2015 @ 10:17
    Tom Engan
    0

    I change version in ClientDependency.config, delete all ClientDependency cachefiles, build and use ccleaner (to be sure to clean cache) all the time, but it did't help at all. umbracoTimeOutInMinutes still dont work, and it effected both 7.3.0. upgrades. Mayby best to make a thread for that umbracoTimeOutInMinutes don't work?

    It seams like I must log me in every 20 minutes anyway, even with activity in backoffice..

  • Sebastiaan Janssen 4941 posts 14781 karma points MVP admin hq
    Oct 08, 2015 @ 12:05
    Sebastiaan Janssen
    0

    But you still have the GetRemainingTimeOutSeconds error, right? That's why it doesn't work..

    Check that Microsoft.Owin.Host.SystemWeb.dll is in your bin folder, and maybe you also need to add runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" in your web.config, see:

    http://stackoverflow.com/q/20058873/5018

  • Robert Foster 441 posts 1685 karma points MVP admin c-trib
    Oct 08, 2015 @ 12:17
    Robert Foster
    1

    Also, make sure you're ClientDependency.config file is registered correctly in the /web.config file - there was a bug with an earlier version of ClientDependency that didn't register the config at all so if you're upgrading it's possible you're still suffering from this.

  • Tom Engan 430 posts 1173 karma points
    Nov 04, 2015 @ 15:48
    Tom Engan
    100

    Have tried most of the suggestions here, but the only thing that seems to be working, is an upgrade to 7.3.1. I'll be testing more, but refresh is certainly no longer necessary - can now save as many times as I want consecutively.

  • Sebastiaan Janssen 4941 posts 14781 karma points MVP admin hq
    Nov 04, 2015 @ 16:00
    Sebastiaan Janssen
    0

    @Tom yes this was fixed in 7.3.1.

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft