Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Gareth Evans 142 posts 334 karma points c-trib
    May 23, 2010 @ 01:59
    Gareth Evans
    0

    4.0.4.1 Doesn't support SMB path for site files

    We host our websites as two load balanced server 2008 servers with a shared datastore on a seperate machine using samba.

    I just had to deploy a new site and saw that 4.0.4.1 was out, so I installed this.

    Unfortunately, it seems that there is an error in get_FullpathToRoot() which causes this version of Umbraco to not support samba paths as stores - at least that's what i'm assuming the problem is.

    I can't even get to the install page with this version.

    I'm going to fall back and install 4.0.3 for this site but this will block our upgrade path for all of our sites.

    Here is the full exception/stack trace:

     

    Server Error in '/' Application.

    Invalid URI: The Authority/Host could not be parsed.

    Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 

    Exception Details: System.UriFormatException: Invalid URI: The Authority/Host could not be parsed.

    Source Error: 

    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.


    Stack Trace: 

    [UriFormatException: Invalid URI: The Authority/Host could not be parsed.]
       System.Uri.CreateThis(String uri, Boolean dontEscape, UriKind uriKind) +5427704
       System.Uri..ctor(String uriString) +20
       umbraco.GlobalSettings.get_FullpathToRoot() in d:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\7380c184e9fcd3ea\umbraco\businesslogic\GlobalSettings.cs:241
       umbraco.UmbracoSettings..cctor() in d:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\7380c184e9fcd3ea\umbraco\businesslogic\UmbracoSettings.cs:30
    
    [TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'umbraco.UmbracoSettings' threw an exception.]
       umbraco.UmbracoSettings.get_UseViewstateMoverModule() in d:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\7380c184e9fcd3ea\umbraco\businesslogic\UmbracoSettings.cs:486
       umbraco.presentation.viewstateMoverModule.System.Web.IHttpModule.Init(HttpApplication context) in d:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\7380c184e9fcd3ea\umbraco\presentation\viewstateMoverModule.cs:29
       System.Web.HttpApplication.RegisterEventSubscriptionsWithIIS(IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context, MethodInfo[] handlers) +406
       System.Web.HttpApplication.InitSpecial(HttpApplicationState state, MethodInfo[] handlers, IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context) +188
       System.Web.HttpApplicationFactory.GetSpecialApplicationInstance(IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context) +295
       System.Web.HttpApplicationFactory.GetPipelineApplicationInstance(IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context) +56
       System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.InitializeApplication(IntPtr appContext) +231
    
    [HttpException (0x80004005): The type initializer for 'umbraco.UmbracoSettings' threw an exception.]
       System.Web.HttpRuntime.FirstRequestInit(HttpContext context) +8897659
       System.Web.HttpRuntime.EnsureFirstRequestInit(HttpContext context) +85
       System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context) +333
    

    Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.4927; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.4927 

     

     

     

  • Dirk De Grave 4541 posts 6021 karma points MVP 3x admin c-trib
    May 23, 2010 @ 11:53
    Dirk De Grave
    0

    Moved this topic to this category as it wasn't really a our.umbraco.org forum issue.... that being said, best place to report issues/bugs on the new 4041 release is Codeplex, as this site is more community driven...

    Can you report this on Codeplex?

    Cheers,

    /Dirk

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft