Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Murray Roke 503 posts 966 karma points c-trib
    May 19, 2011 @ 22:42
    Murray Roke
    0

    Examine 1.1 with umbraco 4.03

    Hi

    I just upgraded examine on an older project, and the first question is... 

    Should this work? or am I asking for trouble?

    Mostly it seems to be working, however after part of the queue has been processed and some documents added to the index I getthe following in the umbracoLog table:

    [UmbracoExamine] Error optimizing Lucene index,read past EOF, IndexSet: AAGIndex

    Does anyone have any advice?

  • Shannon Deminick 1526 posts 5272 karma points MVP 3x
    May 20, 2011 @ 03:48
    Shannon Deminick
    0

    Not seen this error before, obviously has something to do with when it optimizes the index, which occurs on every 100 commits.

    I would suggest your completely delete your indexes and the re-index everything (if you haven't tried this already).

    To answer your first question, yes it should work, but depends on how old your old project was and the version of Lucene it was using, etc... I would also recommend making sure that you are using the latest config types, reference here:

    http://examine.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Full%20Configuration%20Markup%20%26%20Options&referringTitle=Documentation

    Everything is backwards compatible, but there are alot of things now marked obsolete, for instance, looking at the following config:

    add name="ConvensionNamedIndexer" type="UmbracoExamine.UmbracoContentIndexer, UmbracoExamine"/>

    used to be something like type="UmbracoExamine.ContentLuceneIndexer" (or something similar). Its recommended to use the latest types that are not obsolete.

  • Shannon Deminick 1526 posts 5272 karma points MVP 3x
    May 20, 2011 @ 03:54
    Shannon Deminick
    0

    not sure if this helps but this Lucene thread references your error:

    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09519.html

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft