Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • AmandaEly 123 posts 379 karma points
    Jul 24, 2015 @ 15:24
    AmandaEly
    0

    Which is the best way to list things that don't need names?

    Hi, I am working on a local runners site. That means I record a lot of race details. I think the best way to convert the old style of a flat file with a separate row for every single result is to create an umbraco doctype instance for each race and then hang a list of results off that. I'm sure you'll agree. So at first I created a PetaPoco table of results with ids of race event, member runner and so on. This is unsatisfactory for various reasons:

    1) Sooner or later, when querying the data you get a ysod telling you that you have more than one DataReader open. I solved that with the rather evil MultipleResultsetsActive as I didn't manage to cure it by programmatic means. 2) It will be easier for my users (I think) if I can use an Umbraco doctype for result. I can make it faster with Examine Indexes and I can make a nice dashboard for entered results.

    In the middle of shifting over my data to the new doctype, I suddenly realise that a race result doesn't have a name. It is connected to a runner and a race but it makes very little sense for what is essentially just a table row to have a name of its own.

    Any suggestions how I could either make better use of the PetaPoco thing when querying the database and also make a nice dashboard Or if I can create a doctype instance with no name?

  • AmandaEly 123 posts 379 karma points
    Jul 24, 2015 @ 17:36
    AmandaEly
    0

    Well, I have decided to use Runner name as the name. There will be a lot of repetition but not within sets of children.

  • This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.

    You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.

Please Sign in or register to post replies