Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Brian 7 posts 27 karma points
    May 05, 2017 @ 09:00
    Brian
    0

    Umbraco cloud trial getting lots of "there is already an open DataReader" errors

    I started a trial yesterday and did the most basic of setups but in a number of places in the admin site I get errors that stop pages loading like this on a translation page:

    =============================

    An unhandled exception occurred System.Web.HttpUnhandledException (0x80004005): Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpUnhandledException' was thrown. ---> System.Exception: Exception while creating a value. ---> System.InvalidOperationException: There is already an open DataReader associated with this Command which must be closed first. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.ValidateConnectionForExecute(SqlCommand command) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.ValidateConnectionForExecute(String method, SqlCommand command) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ValidateCommand(String method, Boolean async) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, TaskCompletionSource1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean& usedCache, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteDbDataReader(CommandBehavior behavior) at System.Data.Common.DbCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior) at StackExchange.Profiling.Data.ProfiledDbCommand.ExecuteDbDataReader(CommandBehavior behavior) at System.Data.Common.DbCommand.System.Data.IDbCommand.ExecuteReader() at Umbraco.Core.Persistence.PetaPocoCommandExtensions.<>c__DisplayClass4.<ExecuteReaderWithRetry>b__3() at Umbraco.Core.Persistence.FaultHandling.RetryPolicy.ExecuteAction[TResult](Func1 func) at Umbraco.Core.Persistence.PetaPocoCommandExtensions.ExecuteReaderWithRetry(IDbCommand command, RetryPolicy cmdRetryPolicy, RetryPolicy conRetryPolicy) at Umbraco.Core.Persistence.PetaPocoCommandExtensions.ExecuteReaderWithRetry(IDbCommand command, RetryPolicy retryPolicy) at Umbraco.Core.Persistence.PetaPocoCommandExtensions.ExecuteReaderWithRetry(IDbCommand command) at Umbraco.Core.Persistence.Database.

  • Dave Woestenborghs 3504 posts 12135 karma points MVP 9x admin c-trib
    May 09, 2017 @ 10:47
    Dave Woestenborghs
    0

    Hi Brian,

    Are you running 7.6 ?

    And do you have SEO checker installed ? I've seen a couple of post with this error related to SEO checker on 7.6

    Dave

  • Brian 7 posts 27 karma points
    May 09, 2017 @ 11:02
    Brian
    0

    we are running this on your new cloud so its the very latest released there and we have not installed any plugins before getting this error. I have tried some since then but not the SEO checker

  • Paul Wright (suedeapple) 277 posts 704 karma points
    May 12, 2017 @ 14:28
    Paul Wright (suedeapple)
    0

    It's likely the "translation" section code is still using the old SqlReader, and causing these errors. I'd be tempted to raise this issue on issues.umbraco.org

    I did manage to overcome this on a non AZURE site by setting MultipleActiveResultSets to True in the connection string.

    I'm guessing the UmbracoCloud instances have Multiple Active Result Sets set to "False", and can't be overriden.

  • Paul Wright (suedeapple) 277 posts 704 karma points
    May 12, 2017 @ 14:39
    Paul Wright (suedeapple)
    1

    Guessing this is what you did :-)

    http://g.recordit.co/YeS125ND6e.gif

  • Paul Wright (suedeapple) 277 posts 704 karma points
    May 12, 2017 @ 14:47
    Paul Wright (suedeapple)
    1

    Created a new issue for it...

    http://issues.umbraco.org/issue/U4-9907

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft