Hey Gabor,

Did you find a solution to this? I'm experiencing the same issue on a U13 project.

Thanks!

We have multiple Umbraco 10 instances running on fargate (Linux) using AWS S3 with this Nuget package:

https://www.nuget.org/packages/Our.Umbraco.StorageProviders.AWSS3/1.3.0

Getting it to work required a few tweaks.

These Nuget Packages: (although ours are not these exact versions)

https://www.nuget.org/packages/AWSSDK.Extensions.NETCore.Setup/3.7.3

https://www.nuget.org/packages/AWSSDK.S3/3.7.9.53

https://www.nuget.org/packages/Our.Umbraco.StorageProviders.AWSS3/1.3.0

This appsetting section:

"AWS": {
  "AccessKey": "BLAH BLAH BLAH 1",
  "AccessSecret": "BLAH BLAH BLAH 2",
  "AWSProfileName": "awsprofile1",
  "BucketName": "folder1/subfolder",
  "EndPoint": "s3.eu-south-9.amazonaws.com",
  "MediaDomain": "blahblah.cloudfront.net",
  "MediaPrefix": "media",
  "Profile": "awsprofile1",
  "ProfilesLocation": "./aws.config",
  "Region": "eu-south-9",
},

This appsetting:

"Umbraco": {
  "CMS": {
    "Storage": {
      "AWSS3": {
        "Media": {
          "BucketName": "folder1/subfolder"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

a seperate file that contains the AWS creds - even though they are there in the appsettings: - we called ours aws.config, but its just a text file:

[awsprofile1]
aws_access_key_id=BLAH BLAH BLAH 1
aws_secret_access_key=BLAH BLAH BLAH 2
aws_default_region=eu-south-9
region=eu-south-9

You can see its referenced in the AWS appsettings section. We have multiple named profiles in ours for the different environments

Startup/program.cs

var awsOption = _config.GetAWSOptions();

services.AddDefaultAWSOptions(awsOption);

Our system is a headless one, and the front end access goes via cloudfront, so although the Images show up in the CMS, we have no front end views in the Umbraco project. I would assume they do work in the front end views - as they show in the back office. Our FE project is Next JS.

This has been in multiple production setups for 18+ months now

Hi Mark,

Unfortunately not - we have instead gone with mapped drives on the containers, so we have a persisted file storage. This seems to work perfectly. Or use Azure Blob storage, that also works perfectly.

is working on a reply...