Flexible load balancing — two sites, three host names
Hi all,
Would the following load-balancing approach run into any problems?
VM1 — site1 — two host names, loadbalanced.xyz and master.xyz
VM2 — site2 — loadbalanced.xyz
All editing goes through master.xyz hostname which is not load-balanced.
All rendering goes through loadbalanced.xyz hostname which is load-balanced.
Scheduling is configured to point to master.xyz, currently through scheduledTasks baseUrl.
I know it's not quite the recommended approach, however I want to understand if there will be any issues with using it as interim step before we align with a better one.
Flexible load balancing — two sites, three host names
Hi all,
Would the following load-balancing approach run into any problems?
All editing goes through master.xyz hostname which is not load-balanced.
All rendering goes through loadbalanced.xyz hostname which is load-balanced.
Scheduling is configured to point to master.xyz, currently through scheduledTasks baseUrl.
I know it's not quite the recommended approach, however I want to understand if there will be any issues with using it as interim step before we align with a better one.
is working on a reply...
This forum is in read-only mode while we transition to the new forum.
You can continue this topic on the new forum by tapping the "Continue discussion" link below.