Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Andreas 2 posts 72 karma points
    Aug 25, 2017 @ 12:53
    Andreas
    0

    Problems with document type (UmbracoApi/Content/GetById) after upgrading from 7..3.3 to 7.6.5.

    Hi,

    I´ve been trying to upgrade a site from version 7.3.3 to 7.5.9 and now to 7.6.5. The upgraded site seems to be working correctly but there is a problem in the backoffice:

    In settings-> document types I get the following error when choosing any of the types we have:

    Request error: The URL returned a 404 (not found): /umbraco/backoffice/UmbracoApi/Content/GetById

    The page with the chosen document type seems to render without problem but i still get the error. I´ve been following the guidelines for upgrading and merged the configs. And I noticed that the document type in the trees.config have "type = Umbraco.Web.Trees.ContentTypeTreeController, umbraco" instead of the old umbraco.loadNodeTypes.

    Have anyone had this problem and knows what i´ve missed when upgrading?

  • Alex Skrypnyk 6182 posts 24283 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    Aug 28, 2017 @ 10:57
    Alex Skrypnyk
    0

    Hi Andreas

    You have to use "trees.config" from latest Umbraco. There are right namespaces.

    Thanks,

    Alex

  • Alex Skrypnyk 6182 posts 24283 karma points MVP 8x admin c-trib
    Aug 31, 2017 @ 14:49
    Alex Skrypnyk
    0

    Hi Andreas

    Did you fix the issue?

    Share with our community, please.

    thanks,

    Alex

  • Andreas 2 posts 72 karma points
    Sep 01, 2017 @ 08:35
    Andreas
    0

    Hi, sorry for the late reply.

    I was a bit unclear in my first post, but i had already merged the trees.config and was using the new namespaces. The error is still there and I have compared most of the configs without finding anything that would cause this.

    I have to pause the upgrade for now until I have more time for it.

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft