What is the domian or url of the packages in Umbraco. I'think I have a issue with my CSP settings. The install process stops halfway thru and it might be because of the CSP settings I have. So I would like to check if the location of the packages are added to the settings.
I'm not sure but it looks like the package got installed.
One more question thou. If i take a look inside the installedPackages.config file. Now there is one package id for the previous version of the package and a second for the new version. Is this normal? In my mind the older version would get removed upon upgrading the same package to a new version?
What about "packageGuid" attribute? I believe that "packageGuid" is more important then id in that config, agree with you that older package entry should be removed.
Download url or domain of packages in umbraco
Hi,
What is the domian or url of the packages in Umbraco. I'think I have a issue with my CSP settings. The install process stops halfway thru and it might be because of the CSP settings I have. So I would like to check if the location of the packages are added to the settings.
Hi David
I think that domain is https://our.umbraco.com/
Thanks
Alex
Thanks Alex,
That's strange, I already have that domain in the CSP value. Have to look in to it more then.
I'm getting this error in the console when I try to install the package?
"GET http://localhost:50358/umbraco/backoffice/UmbracoApi/PackageInstall/Fetch?packageGuid=fef6e0cd-9b1a-4aef-911d-2fa3218a1d60 400 (Bad Request)"
Any Idea?
If you have a look at this method in core - https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-CMS/blob/ae5a5bd2c00379d25eb2cc8ce5e64158900c70d5/src/Umbraco.Web/Editors/PackageInstallController.cs#L474
There is nothing about network connection, maybe something wrong with access to the disk?
Thanks for your help Alex,
I'm not sure but it looks like the package got installed.
One more question thou. If i take a look inside the installedPackages.config file. Now there is one package id for the previous version of the package and a second for the new version. Is this normal? In my mind the older version would get removed upon upgrading the same package to a new version?
What about "packageGuid" attribute? I believe that "packageGuid" is more important then id in that config, agree with you that older package entry should be removed.
Okey, so I found source of the problem. I had a rewrite rule that caused the package not to complete the install process...
So i guess it got "kind of installed" but didn't complete all of the processes.
Glad that issue has been fixed :)
Thank you for your time Alex!
is working on a reply...