Hi Eran,

What version of Umbraco are you using? And what version of IIS?

Many thanks

Matt

i'm using IIS7 and Umbraco v4.5.1

BTW, its not local server, its softsys shared hosting.

Eran.

Hi Eran,

.NET 4 or .NET 3.5?

Many thanks

Matt

.NET 4.

Hmmm,

I'm not entirely sure then as it doesn't really do that much. Could do with a stack trace or something around the "Object reference..." bit to be able to narrow it down really.

The uninstall I can take a look at (not sure whether it's due to an issue I've noticed recently http://umbraco.codeplex.com/workitem/28829) as it should uninstall itself.

On another note though (and I'm sure you know, but I need to be clear), this package is very much in Alpha and was pretty much put together for the challenge of it seing as is was released on the same day as the IE9 Beta release. The Umbraco 4.6 update coming soon will have all of these features included as standard, so this package will no doubt be defunked. By all means install it to see what is possible, but I wouldn't advise you install it on a live environment.

Many thanks

Matt

i understand and just the fact that you publish a package for IE9 on the same day that IE9 released its great!
i'm sure that it will be solved.

Thanks,

Eran.

Hey Eran,

That should be fixed now, I managed to find a way to replicate it.

Cheers

Matt

I've had the same problem - i copied over the updated dll but the problem is still there. Is there anything else i should do?

Aron

@Ardon You get "object not set to an instance of an object"?

Do you have a stack trace?

Many thanks

Matt

[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.]
   TheOutfield.UmbExt.IE9Extensions.Filters.IE9ExtensionsFilter.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 count) +819
   ClientDependency.Core.Module.ResponseFilterStream.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 count) +170
   System.Web.HttpWriter.FilterIntegrated(Boolean finalFiltering, IIS7WorkerRequest wr) +358
   System.Web.HttpResponse.FilterOutput() +120
   System.Web.CallFilterExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +173
   System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +265

Hmmm, that is weird, sounds like the same problem, but it's definatley fixed in the latest version.

I'll have another look though incase I've missed something.

Cheers

Matt

is working on a reply...