Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Heather Floyd 610 posts 1032 karma points MVP 6x c-trib
    Oct 10, 2015 @ 00:50
    Heather Floyd
    0

    Macro Container DataTypes lose value on save

    I really LOVE Nested Content, but today found that when I had a Nested Content DocType which uses a "Macro Container" Datatype for one of the properties, it won't save the selected macro values.

    It displays on the Content node correctly. I can select the macro and add parameter values, and it displays nicely in the Nested Content control, but when I save the node, the value is not stored. If I come back to the node later, the values are missing, and the property always returns "NULL" via code.

  • Robert Foster 459 posts 1820 karma points MVP 3x admin c-trib
    Oct 10, 2015 @ 03:47
    Robert Foster
    1

    Hi Heather,

    See this issue on the NestedContent repository:

    https://github.com/leekelleher/umbraco-nested-content/issues/20

    Basically, the content for macro container isn't updated early enough and we need to perform some magic to make sure we save after it's updated.

    There's a pull request that gets around this deficiency here:

    https://github.com/leekelleher/umbraco-nested-content/pull/22/commits

    Hope this helps...

    Rob.

  • Lee Kelleher 4026 posts 15836 karma points MVP 13x admin c-trib
    Oct 14, 2015 @ 08:48
    Lee Kelleher
    0

    Hi Heather,

    As Robert says, there's a whole discussion about this on our GitHub issue tracker, plus Roberts pull-request.

    The underlying discussion for an overall solution is on-going, (abet gone stale / on the backburner at the moment). (We're in discussions of NC going into Umbraco core, so want to involve the core team as much as possible)

    The current situation, (as in today) is that Macro Container is a known issue and isn't supported yet. (For reference, Upload and Image Cropper aren't supported too) :-(

    Proposed solutions are either applying Robert's pull-request patch, or using Archetype... or going with separate child nodes.

    Thanks,
    - Lee

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft