Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Christian Palm 276 posts 271 karma points
    Mar 31, 2011 @ 09:33
    Christian Palm
    0

    Why? separation of uComponents into logical / standalone assemblies.

    Hi

    Just out of curiosity why would the team separate ucomponents into standalone assemblies? (taking from the roadmap)

  • Lee Kelleher 3884 posts 14615 karma points MVP 9x admin c-trib
    Mar 31, 2011 @ 09:39
    Lee Kelleher
    0

    Hi Christian,

    Believe it or not, we've had quite a few developers not wanting to use uComponents as they only want to use a small subset of its functionality, say MNTP - they consider the rest of it as bloat ... or becoming more bloated over time!

    The idea of the separation would be to put all the areas of functionality into their own assembly; e.g. DataTypes, XsltExtensions, UI, uQuery, etc.

    Then developers/users can take which parts they want/need.

    On top of this, as an addition, we are planning to use ILMerge to bundle them all up into an "uComponents.Ultimate" assembly ... for those who are happy with a standalone assembly.

    We haven't started development on this yet... so still open to ideas/suggestions.

    Cheers, Lee.

  • Christian Palm 276 posts 271 karma points
    Apr 04, 2011 @ 11:49
    Christian Palm
    1

    Thanks for answer.

    BTW I think uComponents is really well structured and with the nice use embedded resources - kudos to the team :-)

  • dandrayne 1138 posts 2262 karma points
    Apr 04, 2011 @ 12:03
    dandrayne
    0

    If anything, uComponents should all be in core - it's that good.

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft