I have DAMP installed (umbraco 4.11.8, Damp 2.0 that's what the prevalue editor page says, usitebiulder admin version 1.0.11-alpha)
When I export the datatype I get:
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Web; using umbraco.cms.businesslogic.datatype; using Vega.USiteBuilder; namespace Terabyte.UmbracoWebsite.DataTypes { [DataType(Name = "Multi File Picker", UniqueId = "6e6fe001-0ad9-4d56-aef7-c9e600b02fed", RenderControlGuid = "ef94c406-9e83-4058-a780-0375624ba7ca", DatabaseDataType = DBTypes.Ntext)] public partial class MultiFilePicker : DataTypeBase { public override DataTypePrevalue[] Prevalues { get { return new DataTypePrevalue[] { new DataTypePrevalue("", "fullMedia"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "picker"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "-1"), new DataTypePrevalue("", ""), new DataTypePrevalue("", "True"), new DataTypePrevalue("", ""), new DataTypePrevalue("", "1033,1032"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "1033,1031,1032"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "1033"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "False"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "True"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "-1"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "-1"), new DataTypePrevalue("", ""), new DataTypePrevalue("", ""), new DataTypePrevalue("", "100"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "100"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "False"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "True"), new DataTypePrevalue("", "True") }; } } } }
which doesn't look right,
And when I sync again all the prevalues are all wrong.
Damp PreValues corrupted
Hi
I have DAMP installed (umbraco 4.11.8, Damp 2.0 that's what the prevalue editor page says, usitebiulder admin version 1.0.11-alpha)
When I export the datatype I get:
which doesn't look right,
And when I sync again all the prevalues are all wrong.
If I compare a corrupt and un-corrupt version of the table like so
/****** Script for SelectTopNRows command from SSMS ******/
SELECT TOP 1000 [id]
,[datatypeNodeId]
,[value]
,[sortorder]
,[alias]
FROM [CCTResponsive].[dbo].[cmsDataTypePreValues]
where datatypenodeid = 1074
I see that the sortOrder column has not been maintained, it simply sets these values to sequential whereas in the source they were not.
I'm guessing your export needs a "order by sortOrder" clause
is working on a reply...