Description:
An error occurred during the parsing of a resource required to service this
request. Please review the following specific parse error details and modify
your source file appropriately.
Parser Error Message: Could not
load type 'ImageGenInstaller' from assembly 'ImageGen, Version=2.0.1.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.
Source Error:
Line 1: <%@ control language="C#" autoeventwireup="true" inherits="ImageGenInstaller, imagegen" %> Line 2: <asp:Label ID="status" runat="server" Text=""></asp:Label>
Any chance this happened when you were upgrading a site to ImageGen 2.5? If so, are you sure you'd uninstalled the earlier version of ImageGen (/bin/imagegen.dll in particular) beforehand?
The installer code is only in the 2.5 dll and so there's no way the .ascx could have referenced an earlier version.
It was a kind of upgrade, the site was running an old version. I think I removed the dll before running the package, but was kind of stressed that day so I really arnt 100% sure :-)
Error installing 2.5 on a 4.5.2, IIS 7 with .Net 4.0
Server Error in '/' Application.
Parser Error
Description: An error occurred during the parsing of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific parse error details and modify your source file appropriately.Parser Error Message: Could not load type 'ImageGenInstaller' from assembly 'ImageGen, Version=2.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.
Source Error:
Source File: /usercontrols/ImageGenInstaller.ascx Line: 1
dll's included or try allowing 32 bit applications?
Actually, Just added this for Doug to check up on, the problem is in the package, it has an ascx reffering to version 2.0.1.0......
Thanks, Anders, I'll check on that and let you know.
cheers,
doug.
Hi, Anders,
Any chance this happened when you were upgrading a site to ImageGen 2.5? If so, are you sure you'd uninstalled the earlier version of ImageGen (/bin/imagegen.dll in particular) beforehand?
The installer code is only in the 2.5 dll and so there's no way the .ascx could have referenced an earlier version.
Look forward to hearing from you.
cheers,
doug.
It was a kind of upgrade, the site was running an old version. I think I removed the dll before running the package, but was kind of stressed that day so I really arnt 100% sure :-)
is working on a reply...