That's true. There are subtle changes in the way text is displayed when upgrading from 2.0.1 to any of the newer versions available over the last year or two. Primarily you'll see it in font size and margins. Though subtle, you may want to adjust your text settings to get the look exactly the way you want.
On the plus side, there is a LOT more text capability in 2.5 if you're using the Professional version (lineheight, multiple fonts and styles in a single text item, html support, etc.)
Gosh, it was such a long time ago for that change... but I seem to recall the difference is more likely proportional rather than a fixed amount. Smaller text sizes will need less (or no) changes but larger sizes will require more adjustment.
Fontsize is not the same in old imagegen and new
When using &fontsize=35 in ImageGen for text then it is not the same size when using 2.0.1.0 and 2.5.2.
Which means that the entire website looks wrong, when I update ImageGen to newest version
It is not only 35 that is a problem :-) But just to make an example
That's true. There are subtle changes in the way text is displayed when upgrading from 2.0.1 to any of the newer versions available over the last year or two. Primarily you'll see it in font size and margins. Though subtle, you may want to adjust your text settings to get the look exactly the way you want.
On the plus side, there is a LOT more text capability in 2.5 if you're using the Professional version (lineheight, multiple fonts and styles in a single text item, html support, etc.)
cheers,
doug.
Ok.
Is there, by any chance, a pattern in the fontsize-mismatch ?
ex they are alle 5-fontsize-measures to big or something like that ?
Gosh, it was such a long time ago for that change... but I seem to recall the difference is more likely proportional rather than a fixed amount. Smaller text sizes will need less (or no) changes but larger sizes will require more adjustment.
cheers,
doug.
That's ok :-)
I will just look through the site for the differences.
Thanks for your hard work.
is working on a reply...