this is almost certainly due to the xml schema changing

try...

<xsl:for-each select="$currentPage/* [@isDoc and string(umbracoNaviHide) != '1']">
    <div class="Item">
        <!-- get first photo thumbnail -->
        <a href="{umbraco.library:NiceUrl(@id)}">
            <img src="{concat(substring-before(umbracoFile,'.'), '_thumb.jpg')}" width="90" height="90" alt="{@nodeName}"/>
        </a>
    </div>

</xsl:for-each>

i'm not entirely sure about the img src i'm going to just check this further...

In the above is ThumbImage a generic property of the document type or is it using the thumbnail made by umbraco?

Hi
its  a generic property that I made..
Its an old gallery where they uploaded an thumbnail and one bigger picture,,,

The old code look like this and I listed all thumbnails on that level

<xsl:for-each select="$currentPage/node [string(data [@alias='umbracoNaviHide']) != '1']">
    <div class="Item">
        <!-- get first photo thumbnail -->
        <a href="{umbraco.library:NiceUrl(@id)}">
            <img src="{./data [@alias='ThumbImage']}" width="90" height="90" alt="{@nodeName}"/>
        </a>
    </div>

Now I try with this code after upgrading 

<xsl:for-each select="$currentPage/* [@isDoc and string(umbracoNaviHide) != '1']">
    <div class="Item">
        <!-- get first photo thumbnail -->
        <a href="{umbraco.library:NiceUrl(@id)}">
            <img src="{concat(substring-before(umbracoFile,'.jpg'), '')}" width="90" height="90" alt="{@nodeName}"/>
        </a>
    </div>

</xsl:for-each>

I want  <img src="filepath/filename + extension" .....

/Henrik

Does ThumbImage contain this?

Can you just write...

<img src="{ThumbImage}" width="90" height="90" alt="{@nodeName}"/>

The new schema is so much easier to read when you get used to it :)

Perfect it works...

How about this one

Its so I can step from first to last picture

<xsl:if test="count($currentPage/preceding-sibling::node) > 0">
<a href="{umbraco.library:NiceUrl($Previous)}">
« Föregående
</a>
</xsl:if>

/H

is working on a reply...