I appear to be having a problem sorting nodes in the content tree. I have the following build: umbraco v
4.0.0 (Assembly version: 1.0.3327.20280)
I saw a codeplex item that might apply but it did not give me the specifics of what the symptoms where nor wich build fixes it. It does say changeset but I don't know how that correlates to the build numbers.
Anyone able to shed light on how old my build is and how I might determine whether the issue has already been resolved and in which build?
How can I tell what each of the changesets contained? I am looking at 54308 and it provides no info as to the contents of the changeset, or at least I am prevented from my own ignorance.
I don't think there is any easy way to see it, since not all changes are listed in the issue tracker. But there is a Changelog document on each release on the "Download" tab that should contain some information.
node sorting in editor tree
Hello All,
I appear to be having a problem sorting nodes in the content tree. I have the following build: umbraco v 4.0.0 (Assembly version: 1.0.3327.20280)
I saw a codeplex item that might apply but it did not give me the specifics of what the symptoms where nor wich build fixes it. It does say changeset but I don't know how that correlates to the build numbers.
Anyone able to shed light on how old my build is and how I might determine whether the issue has already been resolved and in which build?
Thanks.
Which codeplex issue are you referring to?
Version 4.0.2.1 is around changeset 54308
Version 4.0.0.0 I _think_ is around 46598
How can I tell what each of the changesets contained? I am looking at 54308 and it provides no info as to the contents of the changeset, or at least I am prevented from my own ignorance.
I don't think there is any easy way to see it, since not all changes are listed in the issue tracker. But there is a Changelog document on each release on the "Download" tab that should contain some information.
http://umbraco.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=23321
is working on a reply...