I'm having a problem in the Umbraco backend. When moving a document that's in a protected area of my site, to a public area, the protection remains on the docuement.
Since all sub-nodes to the protected node inherits the access-rights, all nodes under the protected node are protected (and Umbraco tells you that with a red stop-sign).
If I move Node4 from the protected area to the public area, the protection should be removed as well. But in the Umbraco backend the red stop-sign is remains on that document.
If i right-click Node4 and tries to remove the protection (Public access) I get a server error stating:
[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.] umbraco.cms.businesslogic.web.Access.IsProtectedByMembershipRole(Int32 documentId, String role) +94 umbraco.presentation.umbraco.dialogs.protectPage.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +1194 System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +14 System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +35 System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99 umbraco.BasePages.BasePage.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +15 System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +50 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +627
The same if I try to publish the site.
The fix i found so far is to add protection to the public node (now parent to Node4) and remove the protection from there. But that feels like a very crude way to do it.
Is this a cache problem? Where is the protection stored? The /data/access.xml only consists of the parent node, so it's have to be stored somewhere else.
I have an update to the above. It was a cache issue (umbraco.config).
After moving a document, I manually went in and removed the /data/umbraco.config from my file system ("Republish entire site" is not enough). Then, when the umbraco.config was recreated everything work as it should.
Is this an Umbraco BUG? Clearly it shouldn't be that you have to remove a file manually to remove the protection?
Could you be so kind to log this as a work item on Codeplex as it sounds as a bug? Don't forget to include repro steps, and your environmental details such as umbraco version/os/...!
@Dirk - I will file it in codeplex. Still doing some more research before that. Need to find a workaround.
To more clearly understand the problem I created a custom function to move the documents. It seems that if you clear the cache before moving the documents, Everything works as expected.
public bool MoveDocument(int documentId, int parentId)
{
bool hasMoved = false;
Document doc = new Document(documentId);
if (doc.Parent.Id != parentId)
{
doc.Move(parentId);
doc.Publish(new User("Admin"));
//Need to clear the cache before updating the documentCache
umbraco.cms.businesslogic.cache.Cache.ClearAllCache();
umbraco.library.UpdateDocumentCache(documentId);
//Don't know if this is needed, but just in case...
Access.RemoveProtection(doc.Id);
hasMoved = true;
}
else
{
hasMoved = false;
}
return hasMoved;
}
The only thing that I don't like with this solution is that in the Umbraco API documentation you can read "Use with care ;)" for the umbraco.cms.businesslogic.cache.Cache.ClearAllCache()-method.
Can you just clear the cache that have to do with the documents? I need to know the key for that particula cache? Anyone knows?
Does anyone know if this was added as a work item? It seems to be a genuine bug, can't find it in codeplex but don't want to duplicate it if it is there.
Error when moving a document from a protected area to a non-protected area
Hi,
I'm having a problem in the Umbraco backend. When moving a document that's in a protected area of my site, to a public area, the protection remains on the docuement.
This is my setup:
-Public
-Node1
-Node2
-Node3
-Protected (Role based protection)
-Node4
-Node5
-Node6
Since all sub-nodes to the protected node inherits the access-rights, all nodes under the protected node are protected (and Umbraco tells you that with a red stop-sign).
If I move Node4 from the protected area to the public area, the protection should be removed as well. But in the Umbraco backend the red stop-sign is remains on that document.
If i right-click Node4 and tries to remove the protection (Public access) I get a server error stating:
The same if I try to publish the site.
The fix i found so far is to add protection to the public node (now parent to Node4) and remove the protection from there. But that feels like a very crude way to do it.
Is this a cache problem? Where is the protection stored? The /data/access.xml only consists of the parent node, so it's have to be stored somewhere else.
Version: 4.0.1.2
.NET: 2.0
Windows 2003, IIS 6
Thanks,
/Fredrik
I have an update to the above. It was a cache issue (umbraco.config).
After moving a document, I manually went in and removed the /data/umbraco.config from my file system ("Republish entire site" is not enough). Then, when the umbraco.config was recreated everything work as it should.
Is this an Umbraco BUG? Clearly it shouldn't be that you have to remove a file manually to remove the protection?
Thanks,
/Fredrik
Hi Fredrik,
Could you be so kind to log this as a work item on Codeplex as it sounds as a bug? Don't forget to include repro steps, and your environmental details such as umbraco version/os/...!
TIA,
/Dirk
@Dirk - I will file it in codeplex. Still doing some more research before that. Need to find a workaround.
To more clearly understand the problem I created a custom function to move the documents. It seems that if you clear the cache before moving the documents, Everything works as expected.
public bool MoveDocument(int documentId, int parentId) { bool hasMoved = false; Document doc = new Document(documentId); if (doc.Parent.Id != parentId) { doc.Move(parentId); doc.Publish(new User("Admin")); //Need to clear the cache before updating the documentCache umbraco.cms.businesslogic.cache.Cache.ClearAllCache(); umbraco.library.UpdateDocumentCache(documentId); //Don't know if this is needed, but just in case... Access.RemoveProtection(doc.Id); hasMoved = true; } else { hasMoved = false; } return hasMoved; }The only thing that I don't like with this solution is that in the Umbraco API documentation you can read "Use with care ;)" for the umbraco.cms.businesslogic.cache.Cache.ClearAllCache()-method.
Can you just clear the cache that have to do with the documents? I need to know the key for that particula cache? Anyone knows?
Thanks,
/Fredrik
Ok, another update.
Seems like it's enough to just clear the application tree cache. I'm guessing that's where the access information lies?
I updated my above function with:
umbraco.cms.businesslogic.cache.Cache.ClearCacheItem("ApplicationTreeCache");
instead of the ClearAllCache-method.
I'm guessing i'll use my custom method to move the documents until this is solved in Umbraco.
Thanks,
/Fredrik
Does anyone know if this was added as a work item? It seems to be a genuine bug, can't find it in codeplex but don't want to duplicate it if it is there.
Dan
Sorry, I should have mentioned it here.
It was added to codeplex on the 20:th of November 2009
http://umbraco.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=25408
/Fredrik
Hi
Has this been solved somehow - has the exact same problem as described.
Kind Regards
Nicolai
I'm running Umbraco 4.11.6 and got this problem. And removing umbraco.config did not solve it for me.
Just got this in 7.1.3 and like Johan removing the umbraco.config did not fix it; I had to protect the new parent.
I assume that removing the new parent's protection straight away would fix it but as I was wanting the new parent protected anyway it wasn't an issue.
is working on a reply...