possible bug collection with filter - Konstrukt Support

David Peck 690 posts 1896 karma points c-trib

Mar 16, 2023 @ 12:33

Possible bug: Collection with filter

I have a collection with a filter.

.AddCollection<Feature>(f => f.Id, "Feature", "Features", "A feature controlled by API security (like a role)", "icon-tools", "icon-folder", collectionConfig => collectionConfig
    .HideFromTree()
    .SetRepositoryType<FeatureKonstruktRepository>()
    .SetNameProperty(f => f.Alias)
    .SetFilter(f => f.Enabled)
    .MakeReadOnly()
)

The collection is created to be allow me to use the entity picker in the editor of another collection. I'm using a custom repo, because my data layer is EF Core instead of NPoco. I don't think there is anything odd about my repository though.

When the entity picker loads and attempts to show set values, I get an exception thrown that appears to show that the filter I setup hasn't been correctly interpreted in the where expression (I assume reference to my f variable is wrong) enter image description here

I can't think of anything I can change to fix this, so hence my guess that this is a bug. Many apologies if this is a false accusation.

Copy Link

David Peck 690 posts 1896 karma points c-trib

Mar 16, 2023 @ 13:16

My workaround is very straightforward, which is to move the Where() to the repo rather than the configurator.

protected override IEnumerable<Feature> GetAllImpl (Expression<Func<Feature, bool>>? whereClause, Expression<Func<Feature, object?>>? orderBy, SortDirection orderByDirection)
{
    var all = _dbContext.Features;

    var filtered = whereClause is null ?
        all :
        all.Where(whereClause);

    filtered = filtered.Where(f => f.Enabled);

    orderBy ??= r => r.Id;
    var ordered = orderByDirection == SortDirection.Ascending ?
            filtered.OrderBy(orderBy):
            filtered.OrderByDescending(orderBy);

    return ordered;
}

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 16, 2023 @ 13:43

Does it work if you change your expression to f.Enabled == true instead?

Copy Link

David Peck 690 posts 1896 karma points c-trib

Mar 16, 2023 @ 15:17

Good thinking, but unfortunately not. I get the same result. enter image description here

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 16, 2023 @ 15:52

Ok, I think you are right about the f param not getting converted properly. I've tried a quick update that I'm not sure if it will fix it or not (expression trees are a pain to figure out) but if you want to test it there should be a new 1.6.5-beta0003 on our unstable feed at https://nuget.outfield.digital/unstable/v3/index.json would be interesting to know if this does resolve it.

Copy Link

David Peck 690 posts 1896 karma points c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 06:40

Sorry if I'm being a div, but if I upgrade to 1.6.5-beta003 it appears to break my backoffice.

I get the exception.

System.NullReferenceException, System.Private.CoreLib, Version=7.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at Konstrukt.Web.Controllers.Trees.KonstruktTreeController.get_RootNodeDisplayName()
   at Umbraco.Cms.Web.BackOffice.Trees.TreeControllerBase.CreateRootNode(FormCollection queryStrings)
   ...
   at Umbraco.Cms.Web.BackOffice.Trees.ApplicationTreeController.GetApplicationTrees(String application, String tree, FormCollection queryStrings, TreeUse use)
   at Umbraco.Cms.Web.BackOffice.Controllers.SectionController.GetSections()

My only action was to update with nuget, and reverting the change fixes things.

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 08:39

Let me take a look. That build contains some other bug fixes so one is probably not quite right

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 09:12

Ok, there is a beta0004 on there now if you want to try that one.

Copy Link

David Peck 690 posts 1896 karma points c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 09:19

No dice. Sorry. enter image description here

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 09:21

Ok, no worries. Just means it's going to take a bit more digging and trying to setup a replication environment. Was hoping I could just spot it and throw a fix out quickly.

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 09:58

I don't suppose this is easy enough to break out into a simplified solution with just that example in is it? It would be good to have your exact use case as a test environment but I need to ensure I don't have access to any other data / content.

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 10:28

Actually, there is a beta0006 on there now which I "THINK" might resolve it.

Copy Link

David Peck 690 posts 1896 karma points c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 10:36

I was just packing up the app to send over to you, but you beat me to it! I can confirm that this is fixed in 1.6.5-beta0006.

Well done. Expressions make my brain hurt.

Copy Link

Matt Brailsford 4125 posts 22223 karma points MVP 9x c-trib

Mar 17, 2023 @ 10:47