Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Myles Broomes 10 posts 90 karma points
    Nov 19, 2020 @ 13:37
    Myles Broomes
    0

    XML Sitemap extremely slow

    Hi, we're currently having an issue with the XML sitemap being extremely slow to regenerate after making content changes. We'll make a change in Umbraco, hit /sitemap.xml and it'll take around 10 minutes to load. Is there a way of improving the speed? Any kind of caching we could do? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  • Richard Soeteman 4035 posts 12842 karma points MVP
    Nov 19, 2020 @ 13:44
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Hi,

    It is generated dynamically. But cached after rendering, so next request should be fast. How big is the site, maybe exclude certain parts you don't want to add to the sitemap?

    Best,

    Richard

  • Robert Foster 459 posts 1820 karma points MVP 2x admin c-trib
    Nov 24, 2020 @ 21:34
    Robert Foster
    0

    Hey Richard, I'm seeing the same problem with a site (large number of nodes)... the url request just times out, and subsequent requests also time out. Where is the cached sitemap being held? Is it a physical file somewhere?

    This site is on Umbraco Cloud...

  • Robert Foster 459 posts 1820 karma points MVP 2x admin c-trib
    Nov 24, 2020 @ 21:46
    Robert Foster
    0

    Coincidentally, I also see the following error appear right about the time I hit the sitemap.xml link:

    Message:
    An unhandled exception occurred
    
    
    Exception:
    Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.StorageException: The remote host closed the connection. The error code is 0x800704CD. ---> System.Web.HttpException: The remote host closed the connection. The error code is 0x800704CD.
       at System.Web.Hosting.IIS7WorkerRequest.RaiseCommunicationError(Int32 result, Boolean throwOnDisconnect)
       at System.Web.Hosting.IIS7WorkerRequest.ExplicitFlush()
       at System.Web.HttpResponse.Flush(Boolean finalFlush, Boolean async)
       at System.Web.HttpResponse.Flush()
       at System.Web.HttpWriter.WriteFromStream(Byte[] data, Int32 offset, Int32 size)
       at System.Web.HttpResponseStream.Write(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 count)
       at System.IO.Stream.<>c.<BeginWriteInternal>b__46_0(Object )
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1.InnerInvoke()
       at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute()
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at System.IO.Stream.EndWrite(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
       at System.IO.Stream.<>c.<BeginEndWriteAsync>b__53_1(Stream stream, IAsyncResult asyncResult)
       at System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory`1.FromAsyncTrimPromise`1.Complete(TInstance thisRef, Func`3 endMethod, IAsyncResult asyncResult, Boolean requiresSynchronization)
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ValidateEnd(Task task)
       at Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Core.Util.AsyncStreamCopier`1.<StartCopyStreamAsyncHelper>d__8.MoveNext()
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Core.Util.AsyncStreamCopier`1.<StartCopyStreamAsync>d__4.MoveNext()
       --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
       at Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Core.Executor.Executor.EndExecuteAsync[T](IAsyncResult result)
       at Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Blob.CloudBlob.EndDownloadRangeToStream(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
       at Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Core.Util.AsyncExtensions.<>c__DisplayClass7.<CreateCallbackVoid>b__5(IAsyncResult ar)
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.FileHandler.<DownloadRangeToStreamAsync>d__8.MoveNext()
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ValidateEnd(Task task)
       at Umbraco.Cloud.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.FileHandler.<ProcessRequestAsync>d__4.MoveNext()
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at System.Web.TaskAsyncHelper.EndTask(IAsyncResult ar)
       at System.Web.HttpTaskAsyncHandler.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result)
       at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.InvokeEndHandler(IAsyncResult ar)
       at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.OnAsyncHandlerCompletion(IAsyncResult ar)
    Request Information
    RequestID:9c610f61-a01e-0049-3ca9-c280c8000000
    RequestDate:Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:33:56 GMT
    StatusMessage:Partial Content
    ErrorCode:
    
  • Richard Soeteman 4035 posts 12842 karma points MVP
    Nov 25, 2020 @ 07:42
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Think the sitemap.xml file timesout. , performance is improved in 2.10 RC can be found here https://www.dropbox.com/s/7e5dp4zwdgnm02z/seo-checker210_0.zip?dl=0 But still it needs to loop over the whole site.

    Hope the RC fixes your issue.

    Best,

    Richard

  • Myles Broomes 10 posts 90 karma points
    Nov 19, 2020 @ 14:48
    Myles Broomes
    0

    Hi Richard, thanks for your reply. The site isn't huge - around 70 pages. It happens on some of our other much smaller sites as well so I'm wondering if there could be something in the SEO checker settings that could be causing this?

  • Richard Soeteman 4035 posts 12842 karma points MVP
    Nov 27, 2020 @ 11:37
    Richard Soeteman
    100

    Hi,

    I found a really stupid bug. I's fixed now so few thousand nodes render in a few ms. Below the RC2 version of 2.10 where this bug is fixed

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/eubnvrg46uxha18/seo-checker210_0.zip?dl=0

    Best,

    Richard

  • Josef Henryson 24 posts 98 karma points
    Jan 26, 2022 @ 13:18
    Josef Henryson
    0

    Hi,

    is it possible to add this bug fix to the latest version that supports Umbraco 7 as well? That should be 2.2.4. Or does it not apply? We experience very slow load of sitemap.xml as well.

    Cheers, Josef

  • Myles Broomes 10 posts 90 karma points
    Nov 30, 2020 @ 09:02
    Myles Broomes
    0

    Hi Richard, thanks for that! I'll give that a go and let you know how it goes.

  • Myles Broomes 10 posts 90 karma points
    Nov 30, 2020 @ 15:36
    Myles Broomes
    0

    That seemed to fix the issue so thanks for that. Do you have any idea when you're going to release version 2.10 to nuget?

  • Richard Soeteman 4035 posts 12842 karma points MVP
    Dec 01, 2020 @ 08:01
    Richard Soeteman
    1

    Final release will be on Nuget, hopefully in 2 weeks.

  • Myles Broomes 10 posts 90 karma points
    Dec 01, 2020 @ 08:42
    Myles Broomes
    0

    Perfect, thanks again!

  • Myles Broomes 10 posts 90 karma points
    Dec 02, 2020 @ 11:43
    Myles Broomes
    0

    Hi again Richard,

    We seem to be getting the following error all of a sudden after copying the above DLL's:

    [BootFailedException: Boot failed: Umbraco cannot run. See Umbraco's log file for more details.

    -> Umbraco.Core.Exceptions.BootFailedException: Boot failed.

    -> System.InvalidOperationException: The migration plan does not support migrating from state "V2 Config Table". at Umbraco.Core.Migrations.MigrationPlan.ThrowOnUnknownInitialState(String state) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Migrations\MigrationPlan.cs:line 278 at Umbraco.Core.Migrations.MigrationPlan.Execute(IScope scope, String fromState, IMigrationBuilder migrationBuilder, ILogger logger) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Migrations\MigrationPlan.cs:line 304 at Umbraco.Core.Migrations.Upgrade.Upgrader.Execute(IScopeProvider scopeProvider, IMigrationBuilder migrationBuilder, IKeyValueService keyValueService, ILogger logger) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Migrations\Upgrade\Upgrader.cs:line 67 at SEOChecker.Core.Installer.SEOCheckerInstaller.Initialize() at Umbraco.Core.Composing.ComponentCollection.Initialize() in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Composing\ComponentCollection.cs:line 32 at Umbraco.Core.Runtime.CoreRuntime.Boot(IRegister register, DisposableTimer timer) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Runtime\CoreRuntime.cs:line 188] Umbraco.Core.Exceptions.BootFailedException.Rethrow(BootFailedException bootFailedException) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Exceptions\BootFailedException.cs:80 Umbraco.Web.<>c.

    It seemed to work fine for a couple of days but broke this morning. Any ideas?

  • Richard Soeteman 4035 posts 12842 karma points MVP
    Dec 02, 2020 @ 11:45
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Looks like older dll's ar put in? This is the installer.

  • Matthew 13 posts 88 karma points
    Feb 24, 2021 @ 21:12
    Matthew
    0

    I'm also experiencing unbelievable slow loading of the sitemap.xml It seems you were working on a version that fixes this but it doesn't seem to have been released yet. When is this update coming?

  • Richard Soeteman 4035 posts 12842 karma points MVP
    Feb 25, 2021 @ 06:53
    Richard Soeteman
    0

    Hi,

    This version is about to be released. I have fixed the slow sitemap already. You can use this hotfix version. I hope to release the final version within the next two weeks.

    Best,

    Richard

  • Alejandro Ocampo 67 posts 330 karma points c-trib
    Apr 17, 2021 @ 02:26
    Alejandro Ocampo
    0

    Hi @Richard,

    Any chance you apply this hotfix to the 2.2.5 version for v7?

    I'm having this issue on a site that's using Umbraco 7.15.7, this site only has 25 nodes and it's painfully slow.

    Thanks, Ale

  • andy 25 posts 94 karma points c-trib
    Mar 29, 2021 @ 12:07
    andy
    0

    Hi,

    We've recently upgraded to 2.10.0 from 2.9.0 and are now encountering the same error as @Myles mentioned above:

    -> Umbraco.Core.Exceptions.BootFailedException: Boot failed.
    
    -> System.InvalidOperationException: The migration plan does not support migrating from state "V2 Config Table".
       at Umbraco.Core.Migrations.MigrationPlan.ThrowOnUnknownInitialState(String state) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Migrations\MigrationPlan.cs:line 278
       at Umbraco.Core.Migrations.MigrationPlan.Execute(IScope scope, String fromState, IMigrationBuilder migrationBuilder, ILogger logger) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Migrations\MigrationPlan.cs:line 304
       at Umbraco.Core.Migrations.Upgrade.Upgrader.Execute(IScopeProvider scopeProvider, IMigrationBuilder migrationBuilder, IKeyValueService keyValueService, ILogger logger) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Migrations\Upgrade\Upgrader.cs:line 67
       at SEOChecker.Core.Installer.SEOCheckerInstaller.Initialize()
       at Umbraco.Core.Composing.ComponentCollection.Initialize() in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Composing\ComponentCollection.cs:line 32
       at Umbraco.Core.Runtime.CoreRuntime.Boot(IRegister register, DisposableTimer timer) in D:\a\1\s\src\Umbraco.Core\Runtime\CoreRuntime.cs:line 188 
    

    This error didn't appear in the logs till some 2-3 days post-release of upgrade. Do you have any ideas what is causing this?

  • andy 25 posts 94 karma points c-trib
    Mar 29, 2021 @ 12:28
    andy
    0

    Just following up on this to say I found out this issue was actually occurring on our preproduction slot on Azure, not the production slot. The preproduction slots had the old DLLs as preprod and prod were swapped during the release process.

    Just in case anyone else encounters this issue, check your environments for older DLLs!

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft