Language keys missing in SEO Checker after Umbraco upgrade
Hi Richard,
I'm a bit new to SEO Checker, so sorry for the ignorance.
I had an Umbraco site that I recently upgraded from something like 7.5.8 to 7.5.13 using NuGet, and SEO Checker stopped appearing in the backend. I tried uninstalling and then re-installing SEO Checker via Nuget, but no success. The Umbraco upgrade had reset the following config files back to bog standard
config/applications.config
config/trees.config
config/Dashboard.config
Being industrious I gave in with NuGet and copied the relevant SEO checker settings back into those three config files and SEO checker returned. My own issue, which is minor is that I'm missing some language keys (or something similar)
Could you point me in what direction the language comes from, or in the direction to an upgrade manual for SEO Checker. My Google-Fu skills are failing me.
Language keys missing in SEO Checker after Umbraco upgrade
Hi Richard,
I'm a bit new to SEO Checker, so sorry for the ignorance.
I had an Umbraco site that I recently upgraded from something like 7.5.8 to 7.5.13 using NuGet, and SEO Checker stopped appearing in the backend. I tried uninstalling and then re-installing SEO Checker via Nuget, but no success. The Umbraco upgrade had reset the following config files back to bog standard
Being industrious I gave in with NuGet and copied the relevant SEO checker settings back into those three config files and SEO checker returned. My own issue, which is minor is that I'm missing some language keys (or something similar)
Could you point me in what direction the language comes from, or in the direction to an upgrade manual for SEO Checker. My Google-Fu skills are failing me.
Cheers
Jonathan
Hey Jonathan,
The section title should be at ~/umbraco/Config/Lang/en.xml. You should have something like this there:
Cheers!
Cristhian.
Indeed,
make sure
<key alias="seochecker">SEO Checker</key>
exists in the sections section of the language fileand make sure the actions section contains
Hope this helps,
Richard
Worked a treat, thank you both
is working on a reply...