Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Alex Skrypnyk (skrypnyk.dev) 6061 posts 23313 karma points MVP 6x admin c-trib
    Jul 30, 2021 @ 23:58
    Alex Skrypnyk (skrypnyk.dev)
    0

    Rendering default title and description without calling CurrentPage

    Hello

    I'm trying to get the default title and description for the current page, but this page doesn't have SEOChecker property, so I can't use .GetPropertyValue

    Is there another way to get default values for the current page?

    Thanks,

    Alex

  • Chriztian Steinmeier 2750 posts 8456 karma points MVP 6x admin c-trib
    Aug 03, 2021 @ 08:26
    Chriztian Steinmeier
    1

    Hi Alex,

    I do not know how this property works, but in the end what gets rendered for any page is determined by the template/partial(s), so maybe you need to have look there and see if it's easy to know which properties are being used?

    (I'm assuming SEOChecker calls the frontend to see what gets rendered)

    /Chriztian

  • Alex Skrypnyk (skrypnyk.dev) 6061 posts 23313 karma points MVP 6x admin c-trib
    Aug 04, 2021 @ 23:59
    Alex Skrypnyk (skrypnyk.dev)
    0

    Hi Chriztian

    Thanks for your reply. The issue is that we don't want to add SEOChecker properties on the page, but we want to use the SEOChecker functionality on the page.

    We want to render default MetaTitle and Meta description for this page and this doctype- this functionality is available in SEOChecker, but looks like it's working only when you have SEOChecker property on the page.

    We would like to avoid adding SEOChecker property on the page and use all functionality.

    Thanks, Alex

  • Richard Soeteman 3977 posts 12479 karma points MVP
    Aug 09, 2021 @ 06:51
    Richard Soeteman
    100

    Hi Alex,

    SEOChecker needs to have the property type. Only then it can render the default properties for you.

    Best,

    Richard

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft