Copied to clipboard

Flag this post as spam?

This post will be reported to the moderators as potential spam to be looked at


  • Jan Brinker 77 posts 103 karma points
    Sep 28, 2013 @ 15:54
    Jan Brinker
    0

    Feature request: umbracoNaviHide in Base DocumentType

    I just saw that on my work-in-progress site the comment-configuration for my blog was listed in my sitemaps.

    No biggy for me to add the umbracoNaviHide property to the DocumentType to make it invisible, but that's one thing that imo should be pre-configured. Even if there is no template to render those nodes that are linked in the sitemaps, internals like these just do not belong there.

  • Anthony Dang 1404 posts 2558 karma points MVP c-trib
    Sep 30, 2013 @ 17:12
    Anthony Dang
    0

    Thanks for your input.

    In my opinion, umbracoNaviHide is used for hiding a page.

    If there is no template then it's not a page. Sitemaps should take care of only rendering nodes that have templates.

  • Jan Brinker 77 posts 103 karma points
    Sep 30, 2013 @ 17:19
    Jan Brinker
    0

    Good point.

    Along the same thougt.. configuration is not really Website-Content either.

  • Anthony Dang 1404 posts 2558 karma points MVP c-trib
    Sep 30, 2013 @ 17:40
    Anthony Dang
    0

    Configuration in content nodes is a bit of a hack around the nature of a tree. Although we tend to use nodes for config a lot.

    Ideally I would love to have a different interface and layout (possibly in a dashboard).

     

     

     

Please Sign in or register to post replies

Write your reply to:

Draft